--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [...] > > > I prefer something along the lines of the above -- a competitive, > > > market-driven, pro-consumer choice system -- to another bloated, > > > stogy, bureaucratic, one-choice, goverment health care program. Your > > > tastes may vary. > > > > Pardon, but that's STILL the bandaide model. The NLP's proposals, while > > unrealistic to implement, contained the only core truth of the matter: > > we have a system that rewards ill-health over good health. > > Well its a 3 foot long band-aid. > > But I forgot to include a part of the proposal. 30% of the tax credit > would only be eligble for preventative, wellness measures (unless a > person is currently accutely ill). And there would be an in pocket > cash benefit to those who underspend their tax credit on a regualr > basis -- rewarding wellness. > > Do you have alternative proposals that are not > " unrealistic to implement".
Reward Hollywood for encouraging prevention-oriented activities in movies and TV shows as a start... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
