--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> [...]
> > > And the CIA would know betterthan the drafters of a regulation 
> > > whether or not a specific person was "undercover" according to 
> THEIR 
> > > definitions. Unless the bill defines "undercover" in an unusual 
> way, 
> > > the agency would be the one to consult on that matter, not the 
> > > lawmakers.
> > 
> > Whats your point? So did the CIA say she is covert per the statute?
> 
> They asked for a criminal investigation...

A lot of people called for it didn't they?  Congress. The press, the
outraged public.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to