--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [...] > > > > And the CIA would know betterthan the drafters of a regulation > > > > whether or not a specific person was "undercover" according to > > THEIR > > > > definitions. Unless the bill defines "undercover" in an unusual > > way, > > > > the agency would be the one to consult on that matter, not the > > > > lawmakers. > > > > > > Whats your point? So did the CIA say she is covert per the statute? > > > > They asked for a criminal investigation... > > A lot of people called for it didn't they? Congress. The press, the > outraged public.
The Republicans control congress... The press ignored the matter for the first few months UNTIL a criminal investigation was launched. The outraged public hadn't even heard of the issue until the investigation (my brother, who is extremely widely read politically, hadn't hear of it) --only readers of http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com and other liberal blogs or who were total news junkies, had heard anything about it. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
