You really are utterly contemptible, Curtis. You must be taking lessons from Barry: Lie about somebody, and when you're caught, pretend *they* were lying.
--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > Me: > > > > Nice to see you pile on instead of taking Richard to task > > > > for his twisted accusation. > > > > > > Judy defending Richard: > > > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I. > > > > Here I was explaining to Curtis *why* Willytex > > said something shitty to him, since Curtis > > couldn't seem to figure it out. > > Oh not a defense,just an explaining why it would be understandable for him to > accuse me of being prejudiced for referring the the specific manor of Michael > Jackson's death. > > I'm gunna trust reasonable people to see through this obvious routine. > > 1. Accuse someone of lying about something. > 2. When evidence is presented proving that the person was not lying post > other things you said where you were not doing what the first example proved > in a transparent attempt to distract. > 3. Convince yourself other people are fooled. > 4. Repeat until the person is worn down and submits to your unfair accusation. > > > Good luck with number 4. > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > Curtis is lying about my having defended Willytex. > > > > Of course, that doesn't bother Barry... > > > > > > From the post I was referring to: > > > > Hmm, I wonder why Curtis didn't refer to this post: > > > > ----- > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@>wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "WillyTex" <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > > Not all singers are black, and not all black > > > > singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced statement > > > > from Curtis. Go figure. > > > > > > That was a shitty thing to say Richard. > > > > So was making a dumb joke about Michael Jackson's > > death, IMHO. > > ----- > > > > Hey, I think I know why Curtis didn't refer to > > the post quoted above--because in it I'm agreeing > > with Curtis's characterization of Willytex's post > > as being "a shitty thing to say." Not exactly a > > ringing defense of Willytex, is it? > > > > Instead, Curtis, having lied through his teeth, > > thinks he can pretend *this* was a "defense" of > > Willytex: > > > > > Me: > > > > Nice to see you pile on instead of taking Richard to task > > > > for his twisted accusation. > > > > > > Judy defending Richard: > > > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I. > > > > Here I was explaining to Curtis *why* Willytex > > said something shitty to him, since Curtis > > couldn't seem to figure it out. > > > > > > Me again: > > > > You learn so much more about > > > > a person's values by what they do rather than what they say. > > > > > > I guess I should amend that since I am learning a lot about > > > your values from what you say Judy. > > > > Well, we've all now learned Curtis isn't above > > flat-out lying. (Are lies something he *does* or > > something he *says*? Kind of like a Zen koan, > > isn't it?) > > >
