--- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > snip > > > > I am talking about his unsubstantiated gossip about > > Maharishi having > > sex with disciples. > > But Off, it's not unsubstantiated. That's the whole > point. These are reliable people who report this.
Nonsense. They are unnamed. Anonymous. The ones who ARE reliable, have CLEARLY indicated it was a scam. The woman with the Beatles (Mia Farrow?) indicated it by saying that the guy (forget his name) that was hatefully jealous of anyone else getting John Lennon's attention , arrived in Rishikesh later, and then, all hell broke loose, because of all sorts of schemes he cooked up. It was really obvious in her writing. George Harrison when asked about that time, said that there was a lot of ignorance around there and clearly indicated it didn't come from Maharishi. The thing is really clear. The guy (forget his name) was intent on causing malicious rumor and scandel because he hated anyone who got John lennon's attention. Mia Farrow wrote this. The other claim is from friends of friends anonymous people, and therefore have no credibility. Please respond to this Peter, so that I know you heard it, and we don't have to go over this yet again in the future. OffWorld > > >Stupid slander with no basis. > > Again, just not so. > > > Not that I care if > > Maharishi did, but why make things up when Maharishi > > claims he is a > > celibate monk. I believe Maharishi because of his > > 'power' he > > emanates, which, by the way, Rick has said many > > times ...."Maharishi > > has very powerful Shakti" > > And therein lies the paradox and the reason for this > newsgroup. If I never had any direct experience with > MMY I'd just dismiss him as a fraud. The "problem" is > that MMY does have amazingly powerful shakti and for > me has been that catalyst for profound spiritual > transformations. > > > The article with Rick in it was engineered by Rick > > probably, over > > time. > > You seem to be implying some insidious plot here! I > know Rick. He's a very straight-forward, simple guy. > He's not devious in the slightest. He's also a pretty > good drummer, although I'm sure his chops are rusty > now ;-) > > > Was it Rick? What was your role? Are you > > friends with the > > reporter ? How did it evolve from months back when > > you mentioned > > the reporter that gets his ideas from FFL, and is > > talking ot you > > (the moderator) about an article? In other words how > > did your > > inherent prejudice drive this article? > > NOTE: I don't care about the article by the way, we > > are talking only > > about processes, which would be interesting to > > study. > > A study of process would be interesting. What is your > process, Off? In fact why is the article so upsetting > to you? It's not a slanderous article in the > slightest. Yes, it is critical, but why can't the > TMO/MMY be criticized? To me the only thing that is > disturbing about the article is the blatant lying by > the two TMO representatives. For the public,they're > soft-pedaling their draconian measure for thought > crimes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Or go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > > and click 'Join This Group!' > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
