> > Why do the they want to partition Judea, with 
> > a 'Palestinian' section, and then keep the 
> > Jews out? 
> >
Jason:
> I agree with you on the partition issue. 
> Partitions create artificial states. Kuwait, 
> Taiwan, pakistan.  
> 
So, do you acknowledge the right of Saudi
Arabia to exist as a Muslim nation?

If so, then it's hard to see on what grounds
you would deny a comparable right to Israel
and Jews to build a house in their own land.

> It leads to years and years of war. It also 
> leads to massive displacement of people. They 
> should have avoided partition
>
What the Palestinians and most other Arabs
really want is not partition, but to wipe the 
Jewish state of Israel out of existence.

> and enacted a special law by which jews who 
> want to settle there come in by legal 
> immigration procedures.  
>
In that case, all the inhabitants of Gaza and
the West Bank would have to leave and return to 
Jordan, Syria, and Egypt, where they came from.

> nothing wrong with that.
> 
Anyone who actively supports the continued 
existence of Israel as a Jewish nation is a 
"zionist".

There's nothing wrong with winning a war, when 
your enemies all spring on you on a religious
holiday. So, when you win a just war, like the
Seven Day War, you own the land you fought for,
and you can do what you want with it to, to make 
your country secure. 

> How do you undo the partition and recreate the 
> original Judea?
>
The question is, who should be in control of 
Jerusalem?

Answers to choose from:

A. Palestinians/Muslims
B. Israelis/Jews
C. It should be under joint control,
since it's important to both religions.
D. The United Nations

Answers:

"A" is clearly anti-semitic.

"C" and "D" are pretty much equivalent,
and both are borderline antisemitism,
or possibly just plain ignorance.

"B" makes the most sense, and is the
obvious choice if one has any respect
at all for Jews and their traditions...

Read more:

Author: Delia
Subject: Instant Anti-semitism Test 
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: October 31, 2003 
http://tinyurl.com/y8676oo 

Reply via email to