--- In [email protected], off_world_beings <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> , "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: <snip> > > One more time: The options were (a) the current bill but > > with a public option, and (b) the identical bill except > > with no public option. > > > > We got (b). > > WRONG. This was just a first stage. There are more bills > in congress right now with public options and have as > much chance of passing under another name.
That's a different question entirely. It wasn't what you were claiming to start with, and it wasn't what I was addressing. And your > assumption that this means the Republicans will > win more in the Fall is wrong also. They will loose more. > The ones that will survive are those that break out of the > party of no. We'll see.
