--- In [email protected], off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <<(I'm kind of surprised nobody has talked about > this, not even the smattering of women here. > I didn't start thinking about it until just > recently. The only mention of the nonexistent > participation of women was when we noted the > original "Raja So-and-So and Wife" titles on > the photos of the couples, and the subsequent > removal even of this reference to the women.>>> > > Everyone here is very blasie about this now, and it has been posted > before.
Naw, I've been reading all the traffic here from the beginning of the whole Raja thing, and I haven't seen a word except the comments about the wives not being named in the photos. I'm not even talking about the *political* aspects; we've known about the TMO's, and MMY's, sexism for decades. I'm talking about the practical effect of the absence of the feminine vibe among the Rajas in terms of whatever effect *they're* supposed to have on world consciousness. > Its almost like a comic book character, Superman or Spiderman > or something. Its so stupid , you don't care anymore. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
