--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <emptyb...@...> wrote:
> This rule was set up to curb intentional over-posters not to punish > inadvertence. Repeat over-posters might warrant this action but this > rule Ominance is Pharisaical and absurd. I agree. This was an obvious oversight. Isn't it the spirit, rather than the letter of the law we are concerned with? It's pretty obvious when someone is disregarding this rule. Why punish this infraction?
