What is it with you vaj. You didn't at all deal with the point I was making. Just because Maharishi was not an expert or even a practitoner of hatha yoga does not mean he was not a yogi. And by the way, in a post you made to me in response to a comment I made several months ago, you specifically said that Maharishi poisoned his guru. You can say whatever you want now, but thats what you said to me some months back.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "randyanand" <ra108@> wrote: > > > > Hey Vaj, > > > > Most of the real "yogi's" that I met in India, never practiced asanas. > > You should know that yoga means so much than asana. So if Maharishi had > > someone else >who was an expert in that areadesign the course, it just > > shows that he didn't claim to be a >know it all. And it has nothing to do > > with whether he was a "yogi" or not > > Or, of course, maybe he just added the "yogi" as his own alias? >
