--- In [email protected], "yifuxero" <yifux...@...> wrote: > > > right...this is the Internet, not a Dan Brown conspiratorial group. Just come > right out and >state your agenda, no problem. People would applaud you (Vaj) > first, first for doing that; >then reserving the choice to blast the actual > content of what agenda you are pushing at a >later date. Let's hear it. >
There is no agenda, there's only the (to me) obvious fact that Mahesh fooled a lot of us. You see it's not really about ME. So now we know he was not a Brahmachari, a monk, a life-long celibate. He not only lied, he tried to convince others the abstain from sex, encouraged cold showers, testicular ice wraps, the married to stop having sexual intimacy, etc. So the question naturally arises, if you're not in deep denial, how much else is untrue? I'm placing my bets on "rishi" and "yogi". YMMV. It was a pretty good act while it lasted.
