--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > Nabby wrote: > > > > Is that so ? You're greatly misinformed. > > Rick wrote: > > > > Watch the Larry King interview > > > > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0icNZnUxYo0> > > > > This was taped quite late in his life. King > > > > asked him if he had any children, and he said > > > > he was a monk. > > Nabby wrote: > > > How can you claim that He was not a monk at this > > > time ? > > Rick wrote: > > > That wasn't King's question. He asked whether MMY > > > had any children. They might have been 40 years > > > old for all King knew. MMY's answer was that he > > > was a monk, which implied that he didn't have > > > children for that reason. > > Nabby wrote: > > So now Dr. Smear, the king of rumour, Rick Archer > > claim that Maharishi has fathered a child. > > Rick wrote: > > I'm not claiming anything of the sort. All I'm > > saying this that his answer to Larry King's > > question about whether he had any children was that > > he didn't because he was/is a monk. We're > > discussing the point because you claimed that he > > didn't claim to be a monk, despite that fact that > > throughout his life, he did often claim to be one. > > Nabby never said MMY didn't claim to be a monk, Rick.
Ofcourse Maharishi was a monk. And so am I. Which does not mean that I do not occasionally enjoy physical contact with lovely, smart females. I was also a "Bal Brahmachari" until the age of 18. There is an obvious reason why He later stopped using that title. That this obvious fact has escaped Rich Archer is, ofcourse, no surprise.
