--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

[Shemp wrote:] 
> > All I'm asking for is a reasonably honest employment of the 
> > word "real".
> 
> What you're asking for is a definition of levitation that
> can be verified by someone outside of yourself.  You
> are saying that you don't trust subjective experience.

Shemp is asking for a reasonably honest employment
of the word "real," especially in a context in which
"real levitation" is understood by almost everyone to
mean objective physical levitation.

Why is this so impossibly difficult for you to
understand?

<snip>
> Shemp, I'm trying to be HONEST with you.  Levitation is
> no big deal.  You only think it is because you haven't
> experienced it.
> 
> You've built up all these fantasies in your mind about how
> big a deal it would be to witness, and how the world would
> change if it could be "proved."  I'm trying to tell you that this
> is a fantasy.  I'm trying to tell you that if 100 people were in
> a room and were able to witness 100% "real" levitation, by
> any standard you could specify, 50 of them would have 
> found a way to deny that the experience ever happened
> within a week, and another 25 would have found a way to
> deny it within a month.

And the other 25...?

I've been saying for years that there would be
*huge* resistance to accepting actual physical
levitation, as well as profound psychic
dislocation, *including* among many TMers who
think they believe it's possible.

It would take repeated demonstrations, but it
would eventaully sink in, most likely because at
least some reputable scientists, after their
initial shock and dismay, would want to take up
the extraordinary challenge of revising science
to incorporate it.  Scientific curiosity can be
incredibly powerful, and the mechanisms of
levitation could well hold the key to all kinds
of other current scientific mysteries, possibly
even the elusive "theory of everything."

The scientists who did finally accept it would
force those who were still resistant to stop
denying physically demonstrable facts, because
to persist would make a mockery of science itself.

There would be a great deal of freaking out
along the way, including among scientists, some
of it permanent.  The freak-outs would pose the
greatest danger to levitation becoming 
established fact if they sought to eliminate
the sources of their extreme anxiety and were
successful.  Or a government might seek to
suppress it from public view and classify it 
for its own strategic use.

But if these pitfalls could be avoided, there's
no way it would not ultimately become accepted,
changing the world in the process.

However...I'm very skeptical that real levitation
could ever occur as long as there is the potential
for the kind of resistance and psychic disruption
I described.  I strongly suspect the world has to
change *first*.

<snip>
> > But would any serious person describe the experience as a "real" 
> > levitation?
> 
> It's a magic show, Shemp.  And you're just struggling to
> find reasons to disbelieve my experience.

Since nobody is insisting that it was real physical
levitation, Shemp has no basis to try to find reasons
to disbelieve that it was.

<snip>
> > > There *might* be levitation that extends to the physical 
> > > plane,
> > 
> > ...then don't use the word "real", please.
> 
> I will use any word I please.

Then be prepared to take the consequences of
using a deceptive term.

> Shemp, you obviously do not consider purely subjective
> experiences to be "real."

Shemp (and I) consider the unqualified term
"real" to be deceptive when it's used to refer
to a subjective experience--*especially* when it's
used to characterize levitation in a context in
which "real levitation" is understood to mean 
objective physical levitation.

<snip>
> If you really look into what you're experiencing, Shemp, 
> I think you'll find that what you are most fearful of is that
> my experience was *exactly* as I have described it, and
> thus as "real" as an experience can get.

(See what we mean about "spiritual one-upmanship"?)

<snip>
> > No, Shemp's advice is that you should not try to pump up your ego 
> by trying to deceive people by misusing the English language.
> 
> Shemp, YOU are the one who is terrified to call anything
> that can't be objectively verified "real."

For the record, I have absolutely zero problem
with the reality of subjective experiences.  But
I have exactly the same objection Shemp does to
using the phrase "real levitation" when what you
meant was "subjectively real levitation."

> Don't try to pass your
> fears along to me.  I got over that one.

Sounds a lot like you haven't gotten over 
it at all, when a vigorous challenge makes
you so unpleasantly antagonistic.

<snip>
> Have you ever transcended, Shemp?  Was it real?
> 
> Prove it.

Bogus analogy.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to