> > See 17:28 in video. > > authfriend: > In other words, Breitbart is lying about the > audience's expectations as well. She told them > *in advance* she had undergone an epiphany, > and they very clearly approved of the outcome > before she'd said a word about the farmer... > So, if she told them in advance about her epiphany, wouldn't that be a tip-off for the NAACP to watch the entire video BEFORE they called for her ouster?
They didn't even see the edited clip, apparently! So, it was NOT apparent to anyone but yourself, I guess. "Yet the NAACP's leaders rushed to the conclusion that it was true. To the extent that they did so because they had faith in Breitbart's credibility, they merely acted stupidly. To the extent that they did so because the charge rang true to them, their behavior suggests that there is truth to the broader accusation of corruption..." Read more: 'Who Snookered David Frum?' By James Taranto Wall Street Journal, July 26, 2010 http://tinyurl.com/3329cnu
