--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willy...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > In other words, Breitbart is lying about the > > > > audience's expectations as well. She told them > > > > *in advance* she had undergone an epiphany, > > > > and they very clearly approved of the outcome > > > > before she'd said a word about the farmer... > > > > > > > So, if she told them in advance about her epiphany, > > > wouldn't that be a tip-off for the NAACP to watch > > > the entire video BEFORE they called for her ouster? > > > > authfriend: > > Not sure how it would be a tipoff to the NAACP if the > > NAACP didn't know about it. (As you know, she gave her > > speech to a local chapter; it was the national > > organization that denounced her.) > > > > > They didn't even see the edited clip, apparently! > > > > > Yes, they did. That's the basis on which they > > denounced Sherrod. > > > So, you're thinking the national organization didn't > see Sherrod announce the epiphany which came before she > said a word about the farmer? > > I would have thought that the NACCP would have at least > seen the edited clip.
As you know, that wasn't in Breitbart's video.
