On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Rick Archer wrote: > I agree. It’s a parody, written to appear as a scientific paper. Many genuine > scientific papers contain the word “penis” and aren’t pornographic. Others > use that word here, or vulgar synonyms of it, and still don’t cross the line. > So I don’t have a problem with Ravi’s post.
Rick, I don't have any objection to the word either, of course. It was the semi-pornographic imagery along with the personal attack that I felt crossed the line. Then again, I didn't read the whole thing either. Sal ------------------------------------ To subscribe, send a message to: fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: fairfieldlife-dig...@yahoogroups.com fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: fairfieldlife-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/