On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Rick Archer wrote:

> I agree. It’s a parody, written to appear as a scientific paper. Many genuine 
> scientific papers contain the word “penis” and aren’t pornographic. Others 
> use that word here, or vulgar synonyms of it, and still don’t cross the line. 
> So I don’t have a problem with Ravi’s post.

Rick, I don't have any objection to the word either, of course.
It was the semi-pornographic imagery along with the 
personal attack that I felt crossed the line.

Then again, I didn't read the whole thing either.
Sal



------------------------------------

To subscribe, send a message to:
fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    fairfieldlife-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    fairfieldlife-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to