Judy, I think you take the high road with regards to TM philosophy because it's what you're most comfortable with.
 
Now think about this.  If the philosophy wasn't simple and easy to understand could you really be such an expert on it? That is, could any of us?
 
Considering this stupefying simplicity, could it be anything besides a bit too simple?
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: authfriend
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:14 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Former Meditator Creates High-Tech Enlightenment...'

--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2005, at 7:30 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > Except, of course, you don't need toenails to be human. Are you
> > saying that witnessing isn't a defining characteristic, however
> > beginning-level it actually is, of enlightenment?
>
> Not all styles of meditation recognize "witnessing" as important. It
> is really only a characteristic of certain styles of meditation--in
> this case mantra yoga.

In the TM context, witnessing is not a characteristic
of meditation but of one's experience across the board.
It *usually* refers to witnessing during activity, not
during meditation, although it can certainly occur during
meditation as well.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to