Frank Patangalli? He got offed by the family after his betrayal, right?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willytex@> wrote:
>
> Yes you are right I meant Patanjali.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Curtis:
> > > That phrase refers to my opinion of Shankara.
> > >
> > But, the thread was about Patanjali.
> >
> > You said Patanjali was 'full of it' and his premises are
> > 'bogus'. Why would you be telling Buck that Patanjali
> > was bogus if you wanted to dialog with Buck about Yoga? It
> > doesn't make any sense.
> >
> > Fraqnkly, I expected more from a MUM philosophy major. I
> > mean what, exactly, are Patanjali's premises? You seemed
> > confused that Sankhya was the oldest Indian system and you
> > didn't seem to be able to cite any specifics about
> > Patanjali.
> >
> > Buck:
> > > > > > O what a bunch of evil sophistry.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This thread reads as careful veiled spiritual hate.
> > > > > > The beating of poor old Patanjali by mob.
> > > > > >
> > turquoiseb:
> > > > > One guy, having fun with an imaginary conversation
> > > > > with a possibly imaginary guy, is a *mob*? And you
> > > > > dare to use the word "sophistry?" :-)
> > > > >
> > Buck:
> > > > Yep, inciting and intending to be incendiary. Oh sure
> > > > it is in mob and violent. You come on here demagogically
> > > > saying something is no good because you don't like it.
> > > > Curtis joins in. Joe and SevenRay pile on and we got
> > > > a regular FFL book and Patanjali-in-effigy strawman
> > > > burning by mob.
> > > >
> > curtis:
> > > I just think he was full of it and that his premises about
> > > reality are bogus...
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/274662
> > >
> >
>
