--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On May 25, 2011, at 1:20 PM, richardnelson108 wrote: > > > And yet you assume you know that Maharishi "stole" the formulas > > I heard it directly from one of Balraj's students. > > I guess one of the problems with the open, innocent hearts of healers > like Balraj is that mountebanks like Mahesh love to use them and toss > them away, like used toys. > > > > > The same way you "know" that Maharishi poisoned Guru Dev, which I > > have already pointed out previously is a lie. > > Actually I said he was a leading suspect. > > It really speaks more to his character; how people saw him. I mean if > he was the sattvic, white silk-clad, benevolent saint some might > imagine, would he have ever been a suspect at all? > > > > > > > Again I ask... why do you have so much hate in your heart that you > > have to try to hurt MMY's reputation any way you can. > > > > I have no problem if you have an opinion about who MMY was and what > > he has done. But why must you constantly make your opinion into > > supposed "facts"? > > > > So one more time... Whats wrong with you? > > Being born with a conscience has it drawbacks. > Oh Yeah, that's right.. you have such a conscience! You lie, make shit up and have the nerve to say you have a conscience!
And again for the record. MMY was NEVER a prime suspect in the supposed poisoning of Guru Dev. As I previously pointed out, I have been in Allahabad many times and interviewed the judge who handled Guru Dev';s will and many others associated with Shankaracharya ashram. None of them knew anything about this supposed poisoning, so how could MMY have been a prime suspect? You haven';t been there but speak as if you have been STOP MAKING SHIT UP!! Have you opinion, fine. But again I am wondering, why you must lie to prove that your point of view is the correct one? You must have been really hurt by someone as a child.
