--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > He's already said that he missed this point for a very long time > > > (need for Vedic architecture). > > > > when did he say that? > > In what of those online lecture thingies I believe. > > > And how could him saying such a thing > > possibly have ANY weight against 30 years of proclamations about > > established in being and then performing action? > > It was an admission of being less than perfectly correct for the last > 30 years, eh?
I think Shemp's point is that if such a thing were said, it would *also* be an admission that the whole "capture the fort" approach taken in "TM classic" was a crock of shit. The two propositions are mutually exclusive, not complementary. Either TM enables one to transcend and thus become enlightened in any environment and in any situation or it doesn't, and one has to live in the "proper" Vedic environment to become enlightened. Here's a study for you -- if the founder of a popular technique of meditation (who promoted it for decades by saying that it was the fastest possible path to enlight- enment) suddenly changes his mind and says that he's been wrong all this time and the only thing that counts is living in a building of the right type...does it make you want to go out and bomb Iraq and buy an SUV? :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
