--- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's a good expalination of maya but it can only make sense at a > point of recognition, before that a finite amount of stress that is > released makes sense. But I don't think that's how it really is. > I agree -- there is not really "Being" and "stress," for how could there be anything other than Being (or what IS)? There appears rather to be only Being which recognizes itself as such and Being which fails to recognize itself as such, by holding some preconceived idea(s) of what Being must be, and must not be. But by definition, not-Being does not exist :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
