--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote:
>
>
> On May 27, 2011, at 11:00 AM, richardnelson108 wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], tartbrain <no_reply@> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On May 27, 2011, at 10:24 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks for providing these sources
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> One of the reasons I don't post it every time this topic comes
> >>> up, is
> >>> because I assume most people who've done any objective
> >>> examination of
> >>> Mahesh and his character are already familiar with it from years
> >>> ago.
> >>>
> >>> Those who aren't familiar with it won't accept it anyway.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am familiar with the stories. But I am also familiar with two
> >> shanks -- personal audience with one, small group audience with
> >> another. An am somewhat familiar with the histories of some
> >> others. I am not sure that I would bet the farm on what these
> >> gentlemen said on any matter. I hardly think that coming from the
> >> mouth of a shank is irrefutable. And of course, what was said, in
> >> what context, and what was not reported that was also said. Lots
> >> of interesting stories.
> >>
> > I agree with Tart.
> > I met wth Swaroopanand privately and he had nothing but good things
> > to say about MMY and what he was doing in the world. Of course, he
> > could have just been saying it to be nice to me, but it makes you
> > question what the truth is.
>
>
> Many sannyasis will take vows that prevent them from saying anything
> negative about another guru.
>
Vaj,
You are such an idiot. First you produce a story of Swaroopanand saying bad
things about MMY. Then I produce a story of him telling me good thing about
him. But then you say he may have taken vows preventing him from saying bad
things about another guru, when you have just quoted him saying bad things?
Makes no sense.
