Thanks for giving me the post # on mahapatra. I can't really comment on it much. Some of it (about MMY's health) does match with what he told me. I can only say that he had only positive things to say about MMY, how much he loved him and how much teaching TM meant to him. He was clearly moved by his time with him.
Oh, and by the way, regarding my research on the Guru Dev "poisoning", I did not go to India to look into this at all. I just happenned to be there and was introduced to that Supreme Court judge and it came up in conversation, among many other topics. Once it was brought up, I did drill him on it because I had heard the same rumors you all have heard. The same thing with the people I spoke to at the Shankaracahraya ashram. It was not the point of my conversations, my trips or my interests. It was a small footnote among many, many things that were discussed. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <wayback71@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108" <richardnelson108@> > wrote: > > > > Hey Vaj, > > I am NOT a TB. And I have read Judith's book. > > TM works for me and I value what is has given me. Thats all. > > And what you don't seem to ever want to admit is that TM and MMY may have > > some value for some people. It seems like that possibility does not exist > > for you. One does not have to be a TB to gain the benefits of TM. > > Millions have > > I am not here, as I have repeatedly said, to defend MMY. I am simply > > trying to establish what is true and what is rumor. > > > > Now can someone tell me what the reference to Mahapatra is about? > > He is someone I have spent some time with, so I would like to know what he > > "supposedly" said according to the Vaj man. Then I can weigh in on what > > he directly told me. Thanks > > Go to post #48039 for the Mahapatra info > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 26, 2011, at 8:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote: > > > > > > > As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who > > > > acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were > > > > alleged to have taken place. Richard says he spoke directly with the > > > > lawyer who handled SBS's will, and traveled to some of various places > > > > at issue and spoke with people who were contempories of SBS, and M. > > > > Vaj's sources seem 2 or 3 steps removed from the events they are > > > > commenting on, and are never identified in any detail. Usually they > > > > are "a student of so and so" > > > > > > > > > You're confusing tow very different sources. > > > > > > And let's not mention that our Dear Richar N. sounds like a drooling TB. > > > I mena, how many of those are actually left who are hip to the news? > > > > > > HINT: Richard, read Bourque's expose on the "life-long celibate". Time to > > > wake up the kids. > > > > > >
