--- In [email protected], tartbrain <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> 
> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On May 27, 2011, at 10:24 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks for providing these sources
> > 
> > 
> > One of the reasons I don't post it every time this topic comes up, is  
> > because I assume most people who've done any objective examination of  
> > Mahesh and his character are already familiar with it from years ago.
> > 
> > Those who aren't familiar with it won't accept it anyway.
> >
> 
>  I am familiar with the stories. But I am also familiar with two shanks -- 
> personal audience with one, small group audience with another. An am somewhat 
> familiar with the histories of some others. I am not sure that I would bet 
> the farm on what these gentlemen said on any matter. I hardly think that 
> coming from the mouth of a shank is irrefutable. And of course, what was 
> said, in what context, and what was not reported that was also said. Lots of 
> interesting stories.
>
I agree with Tart.
I met wth Swaroopanand privately and he had nothing but good things to say 
about MMY and what he was doing in the world.  Of course, he could have just 
been saying it to be nice to me, but it makes you question what the truth is.

Vaj,  quoting Swaroopanand as the the true source about MMY is like asking the 
Republican Presidential Candidate to comment about the Democratic one during 
the campaign (and vice versa).  Everything is circumstantial.  Depending on who 
 when, where and how the questions are asked, you may get a different answer.

But its like you said Vaj, people will only accept what they want to.  You 
clearly have your position on all this and nothing is going to change it.  And 
so do I.
The difference between us is that you claim I am a "drooling" TB. You know 
nothing about me and you assume a lot.  
I know MMY had his faults.  But to me that is irrelevant.
What I always loved and respected about him was that he set up TM to be a 
technique that was independent of him.  So if he was a womanizer, a theif or 
whatever, what does that have to do with me?
Nothing.  I can enjoy TM, get the benefits as promised and really not give two 
shits about MMY or his personal life.
You, on the other hand, have this buring desire to make him the devil, even 
though you say you have "transcended" your TM practice. 
Don't you have anything better to do with your time?

Reply via email to