Remember the Tea Party guy who famously yelled at his
congressman, "Keep your government hands off my Medicare"?

That's Barry: "Keep your determinist hands off my free will!"

Xeno, excellent job of laying things out. I don't think
it'll do any more good than explaining to the Tea Partier
that Medicare has always been in the hands of the
government, but it was worth a shot. Very well done.

That's 50 and out for me.



--- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
<anartaxius@...> wrote:
>
> 
> This is really valuable information to know, that you (turquoiseb) speak
> for the whole universe ('I think this is a pretty dismal view of the
> universe and indicates that the universe ... doesn't really think very
> much of them [the no-free-will adherents]'). Someone pass the crown! I
> certainly do not know enough to speak for all of existence.
> 
> The idea of an enlightened cuckoo clock is not all that bad. A similar
> idea (unfortunately for those Hindu believers) is found in the
> Bhagavad-Gita: 'Ishvara, situated in the heart of all beings, Arjuna,
> causes these beings to move, (as if) being placed on a machine, by
> virtue of maya.'
> 
> In religious terminology, this is called the will of God. However
> religions that use this model of description do have a problem when they
> make this God omniscient. This logically eliminates free will on the
> individual level. God, in this model, exists - why or how we do not
> know, but this God and will are there, so we can say that it is free, it
> is a given. So we have will, and the will is free. Everything follows
> along as if on a machine, a giant cuckoo clock. Enlightenment is giving
> up the idea that this free will operates on the individual level of sub
> units of the whole. One then flows in stream of life. What one gives up
> is the idea that in one's experience, there is an individual (a person)
> that is separate from whatever is left over outside the person.
> Everything is actually connected in some way, which seems pretty
> obvious, but somehow for most people, is not obvious especially when the
> idea of individual personhood is involved.
> 
> Kurt Vonnegut made fun of this idea in one of his novels: by giving Adam
> free will, God could not predict what Adam would do, and thus God was
> always surprised, as Adam, having free will on the individual level,
> would always do something that in principle, could not be predicted. To
> give an individual free will, God must surrender omniscience, and that
> of course makes God not such hot stuff.
> 
> The Buddha's doctrine of no-self also follows along the lines that the
> universe is a cuckoo clock. The idea one is an individual soul in this
> accounting is a mistake. Maybe there are some Buddhists who believe in
> free will, but the doctrine of no-self means there is no one to have
> free will. The universe as a whole is what is free, and is responsible
> for the machinations of the world. This is what science investigates in
> the attempt to discover universal laws. One of the logical problems in
> dealing with the relation of the whole to the parts is logic illuminates
> the relationship of the parts, it sets the part in their 'true'
> relationship with the whole. But logic itself is a subset of the whole
> representing the balance of those relationships, so it can never work to
> explain the entire value of existence.
> 
> Your conclusions about enlightenment resulting in coming to the view
> that one is an automaton certainly follows, but even if that is in fact
> true, why is that some how sad? The universe remains the same,
> enlightenment does not change the universe.
> 
> This does not lessen having a human body in our vicinity, that seems to
> be the focus of our experience, it just widens the perspective through
> which we understand what is happening. All the fun and sorrow of life is
> in forgetting that it is all just a cuckoo clock. One does not become a
> soggy pile of mindless oatmeal porridge with enlightenment, blissfully
> unaware of all the crap that goes on in this universe. One becomes fully
> engaged in a mystery. From time to time, we try to solve part of the
> mystery. But we will never solve the whole mystery. This gives you, me,
> and others here the license to continue to investigate this here in
> writing, or draw battle lines, whatever suits us for the moment, even if
> what suits us is out of our hands; we can always pretend we are the
> doer. For many things in life this is a useful way to look at our
> experience.
> 
> You have written some very entertaining things on this forum, but I
> think you may not always be thinking through all your arguments. I
> particularly enjoyed your piece on manufactured needs. Enlightenment is
> a manufactured need. Most people in this world do not give a thought to
> the idea because they either do not know the term, or just don't care.
> But if the idea resonates, and it hooks you, then the need seems to be
> real, only to find out, if the quest goes the distance, that it was in
> fact, just made up. Being a seeker is an idiot's quest, but one does not
> realize one is the idiot until the path falls out from under the feet.
> 
> The idea that we have free will is made up, and it has a particular
> application. The idea that we are automatons is similarly made up, and
> it has a particular application. If you are sitting watching a beautiful
> sunset, maybe neither idea will come to mind, just the sitting and
> watching, no mind, just pure experience. By the way, enlightenment is
> soul suicide.
> 
> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Sometimes I really love the view that non-believers in
> > Free Will have of the universe they live in and what
> > that implies about what the universe thinks of them.
> >
> > They postulate essentially an enormous cuckoo clock,
> > in which all sentient beings are just automatons doing
> > what they've been programmed to do, endlessly. In their
> > view of the universe, many of these automatons think
> > that they're making their own decisions, but they aren't
> > really. That's just an illusion. In reality, they're
> > just acting out actions designed by something or someone
> > else, whatever or whoever wound up the clock.
> >
> > What is most fascinating is that many of the automatons
> > who believe in this Cuckoo Clock Universe present them-
> > selves as if they were "spiritual seekers," that is, as
> > if there were something that was in their power to *do*
> > that would facilitate or speed up their evolution towards
> > the goal of "enlightenment" they aspire to.
> >
> > What I don't understand is why, if they are incapable
> > of "doing" anything, they believe that there is anything
> > they can do to facilitate their enlightenment. Even more
> > puzzling is their reverence for spiritual teachers who
> > they feel are "enlightened." According to their view
> > of the universe, none of these "enlightened" beings can
> > do diddleysquat, either. They are just as much automatons
> > as the people who revere and follow them. And if the
> > whole thing is one big deterministic cuckoo clock, then
> > there was nothing the "enlightened" could *ever* have
> > done for them.
> >
> > Me, I think this is a pretty dismal view of the universe,
> > one that indicates that the universe (which many of these
> > supposed "spiritual seekers" believe is sentient) doesn't
> > really think very much of them. It doesn't allow them
> > any freedom or autonomy, and allows them no say in their
> > own lives. Everything is programmed, and there is nothing
> > they can ever do that will affect anything else, *includ-
> > ing* their own enlightenment. And if they ever realize
> > this "enlightenment" they seek, the only thing that's
> > happened for them is that they supposedly realize that
> > they're automatons.
> >
> > Big whoop. I'm much more comfortable with a more Buddhist
> > view of the universe in which everyone has Free Will and
> > thus can affect not only their own lives but the lives
> > of others. Teachers in such a universe would actually be
> > accomplishing something, not just speaking as automatons
> > to other automatons.
> >
> > But if that's the way they want to see the universe they
> > live in, so be it. At least now I understand why so many
> > of them seem so chronically unhappy and why so many of
> > them actually long for annihilation. If I thought I lived
> > inside an enormous cuckoo clock and that nothing I had
> > ever done or will ever do mattered, I'd probably hope
> > for "soul suicide" myself. :-)
> >
>


Reply via email to