--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > This distinction is a classic case of Maharishi's two > > > teachings, the one he used for PR (scientific materialism) > > > and the one he pulled out when there were believers in the > > > room. He used his PR message to appear sciency (A method > > > he actually had contempt for.) > > > > I don't think you can base your "two teachings" premise > > solely on the basis of those two sentences. > > I had some more exposure to his teaching than just those > two sentences. Why would you restrict us to just those > this quote in any discussion about him here?
Those two sentences were what we were discussing, so your post appeared to be using the two sentences as evidence for your "two teachings" premise. But as I went on to point out in my next post, that statement as a whole appears to be directed as much to believers as to materialists, if not more to believers.
