From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Pall Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 8:09 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Sarah Palin and Paul Revere
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Rick Archer <r...@searchsummit.com> wrote: Yes sir just when you thought she couldn't get any dumber: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpHfY1Hor9g And then Stephen Colbert does a send up - beautiful (from Daily Kos): howl-arious http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/07/982824/-Sarah-Palin-Vindicated:Colb ert-Re-enactment-Proves-It!?via=siderec <http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/07/982824/-Sarah-Palin-Vindicated:Col bert-Re-enactment-Proves-It%21?via=siderec> So that's what all these years of serving Maharishi, being on Purusha and teaching TTC is all about, eh, Rick? You are special, Palin is dumb? You and your version of history are valid, you have the one and only true version of history while Palin is laughable? Small wonder Barry and Vaj linger here. Somebody has to show us the errors in our thoughts and the way to approach Their teachings with appreciation and humility. I'll bet I'd beat Palin on this civics test: http://www.isi.org/quiz.aspx?q=FE5C3B47-9675-41E0-9CF3-072BB31E2692 Let's all take it and see how we do, without Googling the answers. I got two wrong. That doesn't make me "special", or her "dumb". It's all relative. I do believe I'm less delusional though. I wouldn't take the Presidency if it were handed to me, because I know I am vastly unqualified. The fact that she thinks she might be qualified means to me that she's got some serious screws loose. History is history. It may be interpreted differently, and some things may be recorded inaccurately, but the account of Paul Revere's ride is hasn't been disputed since it happened. Palin's account of it was clearly erroneous, and her attempts to justify her account, pathetic. You're not one of those people trying to edit the Paul Revere Wikipedia page are you?
