--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > If you have to ask how people know these things, it really
> > > > doesn't speak very well of TM, does it?
> > > 
> > > Scientific research that this isn't moodmaking?
> > 
> > Some people haven't been trained to distrust their 
> > own experience.
> 
> Heh. SOme people are wiser than others.

Wiser?

Let's analyze that, shall we?  Suppose that tomorrow you
sit to meditate, have a clear, unmistakable experience of
transcendence (pure consciousness, samadhi, whatever
you want to call it), and then it doesn't go away.  You get
up and the same exact phenomenon is there as you enter
into your activity, coexistent with your activity.  It doesn't
go away for weeks, or months, or years.  It is there pretty 
much at all times, whether you are awake, in deep sleep 
or are dreaming.

So.  Are you experiencing CC, as Maharishi has defined it?

The only "evidence" you have is subjective.  As you are
probably the first to point out, there is NO "scientific" criterion
that could be used to verify or not verify your subjective 
experience.  If one exists, it certainly hasn't been found yet.

So the question arises -- do you continue to doubt your own
subjective experience, or do you accept it as valid?

THIS is the gateway to enlightenment, Lawson.  Everyone
who has EVER realized enlightenment has had to walk 
through it, and had to make the decision to trust their own
subjective experience more than they trust objective "fact"
or someone *else's* subjective opinion.

I wish you luck when this happens to you, but I suspect 
you'll need it.  Your consistent approach here is to doubt
*anyone's* subjective experience in favor of the opinion of
either an outside "authority" or in favor of some kind of 
scientific validation.  

At this point, no such "validation" or "authority" would be 
*possible* for you if you realized your enlightenment 
tomorrow.  No one in the TM organization whom you have
access to could, or would, "authorize" your experience and
say what it was, one way or another.  No scientific "test" 
exists to "validate" it one way or another.  You're on your
own, just as most enlightened beings in the history of the
human race have been.  

Good luck.  When the time comes, I hope you've managed
to change your definition of "wise," and become a bit wiser.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to