Thanks for the information. I will, as you say, keep my own counsel in these 
matters.

Meantime I always use the formula of maximum sincerity simultaneous with 
(contingent) maximum irony.

In a postmodern universe you have to have the one (which is probably there just 
by grace) while learning to deploy the latter.

This, plus being able (at any moment) to make a stronger argument against 
oneself than your opponent can make.

Then, knowing your free will is part of the mechanical providence of the 
universe, you're set!

--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], maskedzebra <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Whoa. Now you got me thinking I should have JUST NOT SAID
> > ANYTHING AT ALL. I mean in reply to Ravi Yogi.
> > Still, bless him—I think his love for his guru (Amma) seems
> > genuine.
> 
> I think so too.
> 
> > But the threat to my self-prestige (my necessary egoism)
> > seems to have come to nothing after reading this.
> 
> Did it ever come to anything, in your mind?
> 
> It looked to me like duelling smackdowns. You came on
> pretty strong in your second post here, and Ravi came on
> pretty strong in response.
> 
> Vaj and Barry (Turq) are engaging in the time-honored
> FFL practice of "piling on" because they feel intimidated
> by Ravi, as they do about anyone here who seems to be
> claiming some degree of enlightenment (they'll deny this,
> of course). They hope they can sucker you into joining
> the dump-on-Ravi faction.
> 
> But I get the sense you're in the process of making up
> your own mind.
> 
> 
> 
> > Those Indian gods, they play their music on the instruments of  human 
> > beings.
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe Ravi did an interview at Buddha at the Gas Pump where  
> > > > > he talked about his enlightenment.
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://batgap.com/ravi-chivukula/
> > > > 
> > > > It is worth pointing out that as far as I remember
> > > > Ravi has since said on two different occasions that 
> > > > his entire interview was a put-on, and that he was 
> > > > taking advantage of Rick's naivete. I don't remember 
> > > > the exact messages in which he said this, and don't 
> > > > consider him worth my time to look it up, but I'm 
> > > > sure someone could if they wanted. Just providing 
> > > > this information to help you know who and what 
> > > > you're dealing with.
> > > 
> > > Someone looked it up, found one instance, and sent 
> > > it to me. It was from post #279237. When dealing
> > > with Ravi, consider the source, MZ...
> > > 
> > > Me:
> > > > > To date, like MMY, Jim has NOT demonstrated anything to
> > > > > back up his claims that he (and other claimants to the
> > > > > throne of enlightenmentitudeness) is "special." He seems
> > > > > to me to be the most ordinary of human beings, someone
> > > > > who at one point in his life grew tired of being a nobody
> > > > > and figured out that if he just made a bunch of claims to
> > > > > gullible people, a certain percentage of them would treat
> > > > > him as "special," just because he claimed to be. Same with
> > > > > Ravi. He, too was an absolute nobody until he suckered
> > > > > Rick in with some parroted spiritual bullshit and a similar
> > > > > claim to be self realized.
> > > 
> > > Ravi:
> > > > Again enlightenment is nothing about feeling special or 
> > > > demonstrating anything, though some of them do which is 
> > > > entirely optional. 
> > > > 
> > > > You are at least partially right about me - I totally 
> > > > suckered Rick into an interview, my story ended long 
> > > > time back. I'm just a liar making up stories since I 
> > > > have no more stories left to project. I make up new 
> > > > stories to engage in playful fun to make fun of 
> > > > pimps(egoistics) like you totally fascinated with their 
> > > > whores(intellects) and can't seem to entertain the 
> > > > possibility of a life outside the 'hood(small self).
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to