--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] > > But Lawson's point had to do with a child's > > neurological development, not just with psychology. > > I don't know the exact cutoff point of the Piagetian > > stages of development, but there are certain concepts > > a child is literally incapable of dealing with, no > > matter how intelligent the child or how sensitively > > conveyed, before certain neurological hookups in the > > brain have been completed. > > That a story that scientists tell to gullible people. :-)
Though there's controversy about when and in what order "Piagetian stages" occur, there's not much controversy about whether or not the core observation is valid or not: kids, at a certain point in their development, simply do NOT grasp certain things. Period. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
