--- In [email protected], tedadams108 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> I remember when Jimi Hendrix died, also in London, also at age 27,
> that it was automatically attributed to drugs. Apparently the case
> has been made that he was murdered by the forced introduction of
> alcohol which caused him to choke. In Jimi's case it was not 
> drugs that caused his demise as is widely thought.

Someone's been watching too much "This Is Spinal Tap,"
not realizing it was a mockumentary. Like the part where
one of their drummers choked to death on vomit, "But it
was someone else's vomit."

[When asked what happened to their first drummer]
David St. Hubbins: He died in a bizarre gardening accident...
Nigel Tufnel: Authorities said... best leave it... unsolved. 

Marty DiBergi: Now, during the Flower People period, who was 
your drummer?
David St. Hubbins: Stumpy's replacement, Peter James Bond. 
He also died in mysterious circumstances. We were playing a, uh...
Nigel Tufnel: ...Festival.
David St. Hubbins: Jazz blues festival. Where was that?
Nigel Tufnel: Blues jazz, really.
Derek Smalls: Blues jazz festival. Misnamed.
Nigel Tufnel: It was in the Isle of, uh...
David St. Hubbins: Isle of Lucy. The Isle of Lucy jazz and 
blues festival.
Nigel Tufnel: And, uh, it was tragic, really. He exploded on 
stage.
Derek Smalls: Just like that.
David St. Hubbins: He just went up.
Nigel Tufnel: He just was like a flash of green light... And 
that was it. Nothing was left.
David St. Hubbins: Look at his face.
Nigel Tufnel: Well, there was...
David St. Hubbins: It's true, this really did happen.
Nigel Tufnel: It's true. There was a little green globule on 
his drum seat.
David St. Hubbins: Like a stain, really.
Nigel Tufnel: It was more of a stain than a globule, actually.
David St. Hubbins: You know, several, you know, dozens of people 
spontaneously combust each year. It's just not really widely 
reported. 


> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > The sad but predictable demise of Amy Winehouse and the inevitable
> > discussion of drugs, combined with other even more predictable topics
> > that arose like clockwork overnight on FFL got me to thinking about
> > drugs, and their relationship to obsession. I think a case can be made
> > for obsession being a form of drug addiction. Those who obsess on
> > another human being, especially for long periods of time, seem to share
> > a lot of traits with long-term drug addicts.
> > 
> > So, naturally, my warped mind being what it is, I started to amuse
> > myself by trying to figure out *which* drugs certain FFL posters were
> > most like, given the behavior of the folks who obsess on them. Be
> > warned. :-)
> > 
> > I tried to imagine a die-hard FDA or DEA agent stumbling onto Fairfield
> > Life, noticing the prevalence of obsessive behavior, and assuming that
> > drugs were involved. Which drugs would such an agent "map" to which
> > posters? Would the posters who consistently provoked the most responses
> > from other posters be Schedule I drugs (addictive, no real medical
> > benefits) or Schedule II drugs (some medical benefits, yet still very
> > addictive and with nasty side effects). Would the posters who rarely get
> > replied to -- especially in a consistently obsessive way -- be
> > categorized as non-drugs, or as fairly benevolent recreational
> > chemicals? Here's my shot at it:
> > 
> > I'm thinking that Agent Smith would probably categorize MZ (Robin) as
> > Ecstasy, laced with a little ketamine, and swilled down with an energy
> > drink like Red Bull. Not everybody's cuppa tea, but if you're the kinda
> > user who wants to dance all night to essentially the same song,
> > infinitely repeated with only minor variations like Techno music, this
> > is the drug of choice for you.
> > 
> > Curtis would be a good Moroccan hash. NOT that downer hash from India or
> > the Himalayas that leaves you not only flat on your back unable to move
> > but kinda depressed and not enjoying it very much. No, Curtis hash
> > produces a high buzz, often accompanied by great clarity, and even more
> > often accompanied by laughter. The Curtis drug is non-addicting, so
> > those who enjoy it do so when it's around, but don't miss it overmuch
> > when it's not. On the other hand, Just Say No zealots who don't like the
> > sight of other people laughing often crave it desperately, and hope that
> > a new batch of Curtis hits the streets soon, just so they can rag on it.
> > 
> > Vaj would probably be classified by Agent Smith as heroin, or possibly
> > PCP, the latter because a little taste of it seems to make some users
> > bat-shit crazy, and violent. One of the things that would lead to Vaj
> > being mapped to heroin is the attempt by those who obsess on him to
> > portray folks who either like his posts or fail to condemn them as
> > low-life junkies shooting up in some darkened alley.
> > 
> > Barry is clearly cocaine. Some users seem to enjoy the momentary buzz,
> > but neither crave it nor obsess on it. For others, however, it's very
> > addictive, and very much like the olde one-liner: "A little snort of
> > cocaine makes you feel like a new man; the only trouble is that the
> > first thing the new man wants is a little snort of cocaine." Those who
> > obsess on the Barry drug -- especially negatively -- seem to crave it
> > desperately, and even see it where it really isn't. It's like coke heads
> > I've known who would compulsively assume that any white powder they see
> > spilled on a table or kitchen counter was cocaine, and thus end up
> > grabbing a straw and snorting up vast quantities of white flour or
> > powdered sugar. And the amazing thing is that the ones who do this seem
> > to get just as bent behind their imaginary cocaine as they would the
> > real thing. Real Barry-coke or placebo Barry-coke, it doesn't matter;
> > all it takes is a snort of something that reminds them of Barry and they
> > start acting like Andy Garcia's character in the film "8 Million Ways To
> > Die" or Al Pacino's character in "Scarface."
> > 
> > :-)
> >
>


Reply via email to