I did the sidhis techniques 2x a day for 13 years (1980-1993). My experience of each sutra was that through its vibration when thought, a sutra weaves a fabric of the spacetime continuum that favors its result. How that meshes with us as individuals determines the successful outcome or otherwise, of the sutra. It is a willful tuning of our nervous system to favor a result.
A few of the ones I learned 30 years ago work well to this day, without doing the practice. The whole experience brought me to the conclusion that my senses and consciousness don't stop with me, but continue threading their way into my outer world to the point where it becomes impossible to distinguish what is me and what is the other, though I obviously continue to operate normally within my expanding environment. As a review of the techniques themselves, I never felt they were damaging in any way. The only issue I ever had was that they tended to make me feel ungrounded at times, spaced out, as I suspect they did many others. However they were truth in advertising, in other words, quite powerful, and if you followed the guidelines, no problemo. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > > On 08/21/2011 11:25 AM, RoryGoff wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff"<rorygoff@> wrote: > > >> An interesting viewpoint, Lawson; many thanks. I have no idea whether a > > >> continuum of values is actually different than multiple discrete ones, > > >> but I strongly suspect they are actually the same. It seems to come down > > >> to the particle-vs.-wave viewpoints of what is actually a wavicle. By > > >> the same token, all the possible points of view are also Only One of Us, > > >> not intellectually enumarable perhaps, but still whole-heartedly, > > >> self-ticklingly BE-able. > > > * * Sorry: not enumarable but enumerable; and so not enumerable but > > > innumerable; That alone R US! > > > > I guess FFL is becoming Wikipedia where people define terms to fit their > > needs like Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin do. "Sutra" means thread > > and has alway meant that. The word "suture" comes from it. People > > from other paths reading this "thread" would be laughing their asses off > > at TMers and former TMers. > > * * Yes, exactly, Bharaitu! And what does a thread literally *do*? > > It fastens two pieces of cloth together, or folds a cloth back upon itself. > It stitches together disparate realities into a new unity, or different > viewpoints into a single continuum; it tickles Us into remembering Us. And if > along the way we laugh our asses off at and with ourselves, so much the > better :-) >
