--- In [email protected], Denise Evans <dmevans365@...> wrote:
>
> I'm liking this idea of "parallel" or "other" realities.
> 
> So in terms of consciousness and dispensing with the factor of linear time 
> and the question of which came first (chicken or egg question)...could one 
> say that consciousness and the universe/multiverse and "love" persay (and I 
> mean that in the context of "God is love", are one in the same?  Same 
> energy, defined differently depending on purposes we are wanting to 
> interpret?  


The answer to your question is, YES!  But I would like to add what Thomas 
Merton said about God:  He or She is everything that you can think of, but at 
the same time, It is NOT.




> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: John <jr_esq@...>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 11:55 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Mystery of Consciousness
> 
> 
>   
> 
> > 
> > John believes the latter: 
> > 
> > 
> > "The paradox of consciousness is that it takes a highly developed sentient 
> > being to understand that it is the basis of creation of the universe."
> > 
> > 
> > Sam spends a lot of time on whether "Something can come out of 
> > nothing"...or "can consciousness emerge from unconscious complexity"
> > 
> > Heck, who knows?  So, in my curiosity, I googled the question and lo and 
> > behold, the topic of multiverses. I did attempt to read the 4 Levels of 
> > Multiverses from Max and his wonky website.  
> > 
> > This may have been posted before, but here it is again.  It is a 
> > cosmologist who explains multiverses as the soap bubble theory with 
> > umbilical cords that could give a scientific way to explain both the 
> > Christian God and Buddhist nirvana philosophies, for example. I think I may 
> > have grasped this concept. 
> > 
> > http://liberatedmind.com/2009/10/can-something-come-from-nothing/
> > 
> > But now I have forgotten...what is consciousness and how does it relate to 
> > the universe or multiverse? 
> 
> Denise,
> 
> The multiverse can apply to all the various possibilities that apply to your 
> life.  There are various universes that you can inhabit.  For example, there 
> is a different universe which applies for the timeline relating to your 
> choices.  That is, there is a universe in which you are married.  And, there 
> is also another universe in which you are not married.  The paradox is that 
> during your lifetime you have a choice as to which universe you choose to 
> manifest or live in.
> 
> In other words, there is a universe that exists next to you in which Elvis 
> Presley is still alive.  And, there is also another universe next to you in 
> which the Nazis won the WWII and we are all now speaking German and have the 
> swastika as our national logo.
> 
> Furthermore, our consciousness can fathom the probability that our multiverse 
> can continue on forever.  But at the cusp of infinity, another multiverse 
> could exist which we cannot contact or verify with our telescope.  Hence, we 
> can only speculate that this neighboring multiuniverse could only exist as 
> pure potential floating in the Unified Field of all possibilities.
> 
> So, there you have it...the whole extent of Consciousness.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: tartbrain <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 10:08 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Mystery of Consciousness
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The paradox of consciousness is that it takes a highly developed sentient 
> > > being to understand that it is the basis of creation of the universe.  As 
> > > such, this same being can understand that consciousness is different in 
> > > various level of existence.  For example, a dog has consciousness that is 
> > > less developed than humans.  But a dog's consciousness is higher than 
> > > that of a tree.
> > 
> > Consciousness is Consciousness. It does not develop. It does not become. 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Similarly, the tree has a higher level of consiousness than that of a 
> > > rock.  This continuum follows through the minutest particles in the 
> > > universe.  At the most profound level, one can see that there must be a a 
> > > consciousness that created space and time and that started the evolution 
> > > of matter from the quarks to human beings.
> > > 
> > > If you graph the energy output of the universe from the beginning to the 
> > > end, you will see that the energy was at the infinite level at the time 
> > > of the Big Bang.  This is the paradox that scientists do not accept or 
> > > understand since their equations break down at the instant of creation.
> > > 
> > > Conversely, it appears now that the energy output of the universe will 
> > > continue to dissipate ad infinitum.  In other words, the universe started 
> > > from infinity and will end in infinity.
> > > 
> > > But throughout all of this cosmic lifecycle, Consiousness exists and will 
> > > continue to do so forever in the Unified Field.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
> > > <anartaxius@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sam Harris has published two blog posts on consciousness in the past 
> > > > couple of weeks.
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-mystery-of-consciousness/
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-mystery-of-consciousness-ii/
> > > > 
> > > > As consciousness is occasionally a subject entertained on this forum, 
> > > > perhaps these essays will interest someone.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to