Bob, What's up with this "My Ravi Yogi"...LOL..

On Nov 30, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Bob Price <bobpri...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Emily,
> 
> Excellent, it's my sincere hope that My Ravi Yogi (much more functional then 
> My Yahoo) with take time from his busy schedule, stacking all those books 
> being thrown at him, and provide the much needed input you have requested. 
> After reading your clarification to the *tender* I reread my PQ, and sure 
> enough, found two deviations to the scope---desperate for repair:
> 
> Should read:
> 
> 3. Is every thought, that comes into your head, an *idea*?
> 
> 4. Most of the time typing *is* typing and a cigar *is* a cigar?
> 
> Bye bye for now, I need to feed the turkeys, Christmas is just around the 
> corner.  
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLBNXdGrD5M
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.r...@yahoo.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:13:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] "I'm having an emotion" / the pre-qualification 
> (was.... Bob)
> 
> Dear Bob, I think that you may have seen my  follow up post to Barry's reply 
> and I appreciate you expanding on a scoping process for the aforementioned 
> "manual project" you've been kicking around.  I see immediately that it 
> reflects vast and authentic experience on this speck of dirt we inhabit.  
> This effort could very well require a "team" of experts and luckily, the pool 
> of candidates on FFL is colossal.
> 
> My initial thoughts?
> 
> The title..."I'm having an emotion" - it's very feminazi, wouldn't you say?  
> Excellent choice for a working draft.  
> 
> I will have to read and reread this scope of work a few more times to fully 
> grasp its contextual genius (as I am a bit slow) and also pull out my atlas 
> and encyclopedia. To support my efforts, I want to enlist the help of my 
> right hand man Ravi and beg him to get me a key points memo.  Of course, he 
> may reply with "that is the point - there is no point." If this is, in fact, 
> the case, I will be grateful for the translation and beg him to let me buy 
> him a pack of smokes and a cup of coffee.  
> 
> Fortunately for all, being as overcommitted as I am to the self-centered idea 
> of claiming my own life, I can only serve in a "hit and miss" advisory 
> capacity in preparing said manual.  I may be able to provide some objective 
> or subjective perspective on "feelings" and "emotions" - real or imagined - 
> doesn't make any difference to me. I feel like I may have some untapped 
> expertise in the "touchy feely" department.  But, I warn you that "crying out 
> loud" appears to be my current modus operandi, and it can get very tiresome.  
> And yes, my motherly instincts do tend to kick in - I want to protect all the 
> puppies - another potential downside to any relevant input.  All in all, all 
> good reasons not to bid.
> 
> In my role as complacent strategic advisor, "you have my approval to 
> proceed." 
> 
> I am late this year in lining my marmot hole with grass, so must scurry 
> amongst the boulders tonight and collect what remains.  
> 
> P.S.  Your topic list is an excellent beginning.  MZ, should he choose to 
> bid, could round it out for you with ease.  Judy could edit it into something 
> ruthlessly coherent and logical.  You have outed me though - I have no 
> contributions for two main reasons: 1) I don't pay full attention to most of 
> KB's posts - probably because my DVD player (the one attached to my TV that 
> broke) is not hooked up. 2)  I'm still far, far too frightened to put my neck 
> out there with what might be interpreted as "accountability" and would prefer 
> to just hug a tree.  
> 
> >________________________________
> > From: Bob Price <bobpri...@yahoo.com>
> >To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:34 PM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] "I'm having an emotion" / the pre-qualification 
> >(was.... Bob)
> > 
> >
> >  
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o58ypeFFWk&feature=related
> >
> >Emily, 
> >
> >"I'm having an emotion". 
> >
> >No, it wasn't KB I heard say that, although you might be forgiven for 
> >thinking it was. I heard a young woman
> >say it, some years back, and I'm thinking it would make a great title for the
> >upcoming *feelings* manual we're planning for KB. 
> >
> >I'm also thinking; I should not be such a fun hog, and assume I'm the best 
> >suited to develop the "manual";
> >as entertaining as it is, winding KB up, like a cheap Chinese watch (current
> >synonym for "pushing buttons", a.k.a. winding up---if you're on the
> >receiving end, appears to be *rag*), fair is fair, and many of my fellow FFL 
> >posters
> >have had the pleasure of receiving Barry's film reviews much longer than I 
> >have,
> >and therefore, I believe, the project calls for a *competitive tender*, and 
> >to
> >keep things on a professional basis (can't forget: "The Corrupt Practices
> >Act"), we should begin with a prequalification process.
> >
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqoj4zJ3OIs&feature=fvsr
> >
> >I fully understand your maternal concern that KB's recent sniveling is 
> >starting to sound more like
> >whining, which may soon lead to something that could embarrass all of us; so 
> >I
> >promise, the first time I get the urge to change KB to CB I'll stop picking 
> >on him,
> >and switch to some engineering stories (I'll include some working titles 
> >below,
> >to prove my sincerity). But I must alert you to a potential danger for your
> >commendable motherly instincts; one of the pitfalls of circular firing 
> >squads,
> >like the good KB's, are that they seem to be overly cooperative when you ask 
> >them
> >to line up, single file, in a tight formation, and thereby assist yours 
> >truly in conserving
> >ammunition. I'm just suggesting you show a little caution if KB asks you to 
> >stand behind him
> >(or in front, for that matter); just today I read one of his squad members
> >inform us that he is 52 (still pondering that factoid), and then threaten 
> >*My Ravi
> >Yogi* with some Buddhist thugs (a word the Brits swiped from India) from Fox
> >News, and not to forget today's show stopper from the Menza applicant stating
> >she preferred Madonna to LG, but did not like to watch her dance. 
> >
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixljWVyPby0
> >
> >For the pre-qualification, which is open to everyone, I propose bidders 
> >submit ten questions / statements, and/or topics that should
> >be included in the scope of work of the tender.
> >
> >1. When you ask someone if you: "knew them, back in the day", and they 
> >ignore you, 
> >
> >are they trying to tell you something?
> >
> >2. If you don't understand irony, should you email one of your shrinking 
> >circle (circular firing squads will do that
> >to populations) of FFL friends before embarrassing yourself?
> >
> >3. Is every thought that comes into your head is not an *idea*?
> >
> >4. When is typing typing or a cigar is a cigar?
> >
> >5. Before you state that you're more creative than the author of "In Cold 
> >Blood" should you check with
> >someone who has read something more than the "Dharma Bums" to see how
> >saying that will sound to everyone (except the Madonna lady of course)?
> >
> >6. Stop threatening to stop posting on FFL, its OK---we understand, we're 
> >all you have.
> >
> >7. Writing about other people’s creativity is generally not considered 
> >creative, particularly if
> >you’re boring the hell out of your audience.
> >
> >8. Most people, over eleven, know what's up when someone compulsively 
> >tailgates rather than engages in
> >exchanges, for example; when someone mentions psychedelics, don't say you met
> >one of Tim's girl friends (its not the same thing), when someone mentions
> >flying, don't say you managed it, but got stiffed on the price (makes you 
> >look
> >naive), when someone says the speed of light might be different than we were
> >told, don't say you peed on Einstein’s pants 106 years ago (makes it look
> >like you can't count), when someone mentions Hollywood, don't say you lived 
> >in
> >Malibu with some screenwriters (makes it look like you're too big a loser to
> >own your own place in Malibu); better to stop typing and notice the waitress 
> >is
> >hoping you'll move on.
> >
> >9. It's OK to admit you read and reread Judy's emails, to be able to keep up 
> >with her; nothing to be ashamed
> >of, having no life is like that.
> >
> >10. Rama was the last daddy you'll ever have; if MZ wanted children I'm sure 
> >he'd aim higher than the
> >leftovers from a guy who offed himself, rather than face prison. 
> >
> >In case this makes him cry, here are the promised working titles:
> >
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUKLr5C19Bg&feature=related
> >
> >1. Arguing with spiders in Brunei.
> >
> >2. Hand gliding a Sharjah storm front; hailstones as big as cantaloupes. 
> >
> >3. Kurds, Beirut, and Hollywood squares.
> >
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjGpcEA-FyE
> >
> >________________________________
> >From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 2:40:07 AM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Fanboy Robin (Bob)
> >
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> What's goin' on Bob? What are you doing spending your time 
> >> outwitting KB and Vaj and others that shall not be named? 
> >
> >And who obviously don't care what he thinks of them,
> >if they even bother to read it. :-)
> >
> >> We want to hear from you Bob. How's it going from your 
> >> authentic self. 
> >
> >Have you considered the possibility that he has none?
> >
> >Think about it. How much do *any* of the folks who seem
> >to live to rag on me and Vaj and Sal *ever* have to
> >say, except when they're doing the ragging rag? I guess 
> >what I'm suggesting is the same thing you seem to be 
> >suggesting above -- that there is a possibility that 
> >they don't actually *have* anything to say when they're 
> >not playing "Gotcha." 
> >
> >It's just a suggestion. There is a simple way to prove
> >it wrong, whether the suggestion comes from me, or from
> >you, or from anyone else. But that would involve any of 
> >them saying something new, or original. I'm betting that 
> >isn't going to happen because the capacity for doing it 
> >simply isn't there. 
> >
> >                            
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> 
>   
> 

Reply via email to