It looks valid enough. There is kind of that 20 second or so sneak peek at the end. Looks like it has to be done in a group. $85 is very reasonable.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@...> wrote: > > Well, $85 is rather inexpensive. Good for the TMO not to overcharge!!! Hope > it really works for people. I always liked the parallels between the cosmic > and the individual physiology. And in response to Barry, yes, sometimes > placebos do work - at least for a while and more often with certain types of > problems (pain). There is an interesting article in this week's New Yorker > about placebos and the research being done at Harvard on the whole area. > > Well, if I were out there, I would spring for this course. Sounds at the > least sweet, and perhaps really powerful. And since I love all the astronomy > and universe/multiverse/black holes info and photos and concepts then this > will at least feed into that fascination. > > Did MMY himself develop this with Rajaram? Or is this really Rajaram's > invention? > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > > Waht does the new course cost? > > > > > > AS an aside, this is rather amzing that a new course is being offered. > > > they are expanidn gon the MMY's TM and siddhis -a new step. It could > > > also be that they need the income from this course. > > > > > > I would love to see an official description of it and how it all works. > > > Your info is always welcome, but I can't really figure out what this is > > > all about from your description and the way you write. > > > > > > > > > $85. Here is an intro: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSMrAB4vV_c > > > > The Individual is Cosmic: Experience the Beautiful Electronic Model of > > Vedic Physiology > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Turq, Yep, the thing that I heard that was interesting was the > > > > positioning of the 'Ved and Physiology' course, which is taught as a > > > > continuing education course, as a technique. > > > > > > > > It is a technique that is practiced like a guided meditation, a > > > > mindfulness meditative process that effectively clears and turns on the > > > > subtle energetic system. In presentation it blends sci-ency and vedic > > > > terminology. They don't use the term, 'chakra' but that is what they > > > > are working on. They are catching up to where so much of the > > > > meditating community has gone on to otherwise. > > > > > > > > To me this was interesting in the 'post-founder era' in that they can > > > > now proceed in a progressive way towards offering a teaching as > > > > developed spiritual technique. It is a blending of sciency and vedic > > > > TM nomenclature. As a course it has been piloted on campus here, at > > > > Vlodrop and movement facilities. Bevan at the lecture mentioned that > > > > over 200 have taken the course here. > > > > > > > > Taking the course features an electronic audio-visual gizmo which > > > > Nadaraam and Maharishi devised that leads the meditation through the > > > > physiology. It is good, it will ground a lot of people in their subtle > > > > system bodies and probably improve a lot of health in people who can be > > > > bright on their top registers but dull and not hardly embodied > > > > otherwise. It provides something spiritually that was missing for TM > > > > virgins that will be good. > > > > > > > > It is highly amusing that it is a mindfulness kind of process. It is > > > > the thing to take on campus right now. People are repeating it, taking > > > > it two and three times & more, for the experiential component of > > > > meditating with the audio-visual guidance. > > > > > > > > FFL, > > > > -Buck in FF > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds really good - glad you were able to go. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yep, I have to thank Raja John Hagelin for granting me an > > > > > > exemption to attend the meeting. It was very nice . > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for providing this information, Buck. > > > > > I was going to ask how someone who was recently > > > > > turned down for a dome pass got to attend. And > > > > > I'm happy that you *got* to attend, if you found > > > > > it valuable or meaningful. Really. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, that said, was there anything *in particular* > > > > > he said that resonated with you? You are often > > > > > WAY too vague on this forum. Just as I'd like to > > > > > see King Tony deal with a real world audience for > > > > > once, I'd like to see you get real with us for > > > > > once and tell us what still gets you off about > > > > > the TM dogma. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
