> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Jason" <jedi_spock@> wrote:
> <snip>
> > > Basicaly, there are two types of Gods.  The personal god of
> > > Abraham, Issac and Jacob.  And the god of the Spinoza,
> > > absolutely impersonal having no special people and no active
> > > interst in causation.
> <snip> 
> > > Do you think a babbling moron like Robin can make
> > > distinctions between the two?

> > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > Robin hasn't really clarified or expanded on his theological
> > views.  I believe he does make this distinction, but has
> > given priority to the personal as being more real in some 
> > unexplained sense.

> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote:
>
> Actually he's done quite a bit of explaining of this very
> point. It may not be clear to you--and it's not all that
> clear to me either--but he's taken a number of stabs at it.
> 
> One of the most detailed, in fact, was in a discussion he
> and I began about a quote from MMY. I got bogged down in
> the complexities and had to promise him I'd get back to
> it eventually, which I haven't managed to do yet. His 
> last contribution to the discussion was post #295624, if
> anybody's interested. He put particular importance on a
> quote from Gerard Manley Hopkins that appears about two-
> thirds of the way down the post. It doesn't necessarily
> cover all the bases, but it does provide a rationale for
> the priority Robin gives to "the personal as being more
> real."
>

It's not clear to you because what he posts is a huge pile 
of shit.

It's only a fuckin moron like Robin can learn so much from 
Maharishi and yet go back to a religion that is slowly dying 
and will soon become extinct in a couple of decades.



Reply via email to