WTF..here I am talking about my beloved, love, sex, hate, pain, bliss,
longing, separation, oneness and you are talking about this garbage. You
must be suffering from irrevocable, irreparable, irretrievable brain
damage, am I correct in assuming this shaim307?


On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:37 PM, shainm307 <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "shainm307" shainm307@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Is anyone else interested in how this works?
> >
> > It sure interests me. I don't have a clue how it
> > works.
> >
> > > Anyone else curious on how reality manifests itself
> > > and what determines differnt outcomes? This is what
> > > John Hagelin told us
> >
> > What's what John Hagelin told us?
> John told our physics class this when we asked him a few years back.
> > > but he made it clear that he isn't 100% certain
> >
> > That's intriguing. I've never heard him say that
> > about anything (but then I haven't been listening
> > to whatever he's said lately).
> He said something like "You have no idea just how complicated this really
> is and you're not letting me off the hook here."  Then he also said "It
> honest to God is random."
> > and
> > > it's more comlicated than you can imagine. He said
> > > that it is an unnatural question but reality will
> > > provide you with an answer.
> >
> > That's pretty cryptic. Any idea what he means?
> >
> > > He also said it could be an entity on the other side.
> >
> > Whoa. What kind of "entity"? On the other side of what?
> > And what's "it" referring to?
> He's probally refering to the Hidden Sector Matter part of the universe or
> the other side of the equation in Hectoratic E8xE8
> > > also he said it's just the will of God. Anyone else
> > > have their speculations on how this works. I have
> > > my own speculation but I'm probably wrong on something.
> >
> > Why don't you post your speculation, give us something
> > to bounce off of?
> I think how your reality manifests itself is based off random
> probabilities with the exception of Maxwell's Daemon which manifests things
> in an unrandom way. This is all due to the potentiality waves based off
> probabilities with the height of the wave the most likely outcome; Maxwells
> Demon just influences the probabilities( John made this clear in his
> physics class if you ever took it). So you live your day through the
> probabilities with the collapse of the wave function being determined in a
> random way(Randomness is my specualtation as scientists aren't sure). Now
> here comes the unrandom part: your thoughts determine what Maxwell's Demon
> determines in an unrandom fashion. The random part is the confusing part as
> it is hard to think how can something be random and what the sequence is in
> the whole process.  This once again would be my speculation, as I think it
> is all determined by you.  This is what I think matters in the whole
> randomness part: freewill, love, what matters, intelligence of the
> universe, creativity of the universe and of course God, plus probably a
> lot more.  I havn't captured the whole random process but I imagine it's
> based off your freewill.
>
> > "Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, 'But how
> can it be like that?' because you will get 'down the drain,' into a blind
> alley from which nobody has yet escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like
> that."--Richard Feynman on the apparent absurdities of quantum behavior
> >
> > "The chance is high that the truth lies in the fashionable direction.
> But, on the off chance that it is in another direction — a direction
> obvious from an unfashionable view of field theory — who will find it? Only
> someone who has sacrificed himself by teaching himself quantum
> electrodynamics from a peculiar and unfashionable point of view; one that
> he may have to invent for himself."--Richard Feynman, Nobel lecture, 1965
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to