Thus I spend the whole day in 7 states of consciousness - deep sleep, dream, waking(normal), mildly blissful, mildly painful, incredibly painful and incredibly blissful states.
(Blissful = manic, extroverted, oneness) (Painful = depressive, introverted, seperation) So my ex was wrong, I'm not bipolar, I'm heptapolar, fully alert always, transitioning through these 7 states fluidly, gracefully and effortlessly. Now y'all retarded liberal intellectuals, retarded therapists, retarded psychologists, retarded psychiatrists, get in a fucking room with Prozac Inc OK?.This is an extreme case, the only known heptapolar man on this entire fucking planet, get busy OK..LOL.. Love, Ravi. On Jan 7, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Ravi Chivukula <[email protected]> wrote: > And then you can rightly conclude the consequences. > > I go through lot of pain at my predicament and others around me. Heck I can't > even get a girl friend because I apply the highest standards of truth and > integrity to myself. > > But then I get incredibly blissed because I know I'm the emperor that owns > this fucking existence, 'cause I fucking created it !!! > > > On Jan 7, 2012, at 10:18 PM, Ravi Chivukula <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I actually created this world. I thought I planned it pretty good but I made >> a big mistake, I included myself in my creation subject to the same rules >> which I obviously can't remember. But I know this game has an end so I just >> ride along. So I know this is all mine, I own everyone's ass, but people >> think I'm mad and crazy, why? >> >> >> On Jan 7, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Shain McVay <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Forgot to mention the heart matters a lot I imagine. So everything you >>> said is apart of it. But you got me on how the rest of it works. Also I >>> pointed out that what matters is also important in the collapse of the wave >>> function, so other than that I don't kow what to tell ya. I have my own >>> spiritual experiances that seem to explain some of what I said. But hey >>> maybe you have a better idea of how it works. >>> >>> From: Ravi Chivukula <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2012 8:47 PM >>> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Collapse of the Wave Function >>> >>> >>> WTF..here I am talking about my beloved, love, sex, hate, pain, bliss, >>> longing, separation, oneness and you are talking about this garbage. You >>> must be suffering from irrevocable, irreparable, irretrievable brain >>> damage, am I correct in assuming this shaim307? >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:37 PM, shainm307 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: >>> > >>> > --- In [email protected], "shainm307" shainm307@ wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Is anyone else interested in how this works? >>> > >>> > It sure interests me. I don't have a clue how it >>> > works. >>> > >>> > > Anyone else curious on how reality manifests itself >>> > > and what determines differnt outcomes? This is what >>> > > John Hagelin told us >>> > >>> > What's what John Hagelin told us? >>> John told our physics class this when we asked him a few years back. >>> > > but he made it clear that he isn't 100% certain >>> > >>> > That's intriguing. I've never heard him say that >>> > about anything (but then I haven't been listening >>> > to whatever he's said lately). >>> He said something like "You have no idea just how complicated this really >>> is and you're not letting me off the hook here." Then he also said "It >>> honest to God is random." >>> > and >>> > > it's more comlicated than you can imagine. He said >>> > > that it is an unnatural question but reality will >>> > > provide you with an answer. >>> > >>> > That's pretty cryptic. Any idea what he means? >>> > >>> > > He also said it could be an entity on the other side. >>> > >>> > Whoa. What kind of "entity"? On the other side of what? >>> > And what's "it" referring to? >>> He's probally refering to the Hidden Sector Matter part of the universe or >>> the other side of the equation in Hectoratic E8xE8 >>> > > also he said it's just the will of God. Anyone else >>> > > have their speculations on how this works. I have >>> > > my own speculation but I'm probably wrong on something. >>> > >>> > Why don't you post your speculation, give us something >>> > to bounce off of? >>> I think how your reality manifests itself is based off random probabilities >>> with the exception of Maxwell's Daemon which manifests things in an >>> unrandom way. This is all due to the potentiality waves based off >>> probabilities with the height of the wave the most likely outcome; Maxwells >>> Demon just influences the probabilities( John made this clear in his >>> physics class if you ever took it). So you live your day through the >>> probabilities with the collapse of the wave function being determined in a >>> random way(Randomness is my specualtation as scientists aren't sure). Now >>> here comes the unrandom part: your thoughts determine what Maxwell's Demon >>> determines in an unrandom fashion. The random part is the confusing part as >>> it is hard to think how can something be random and what the sequence is in >>> the whole process. This once again would be my speculation, as I think it >>> is all determined by you. This is what I think matters in the whole >>> randomness part: freewill, love, what matters, intelligence of the >>> universe, creativity of the universe and of course God, plus probably a lot >>> more. I havn't captured the whole random process but I imagine it's based >>> off your freewill. >>> > "Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, 'But how >>> > can it be like that?' because you will get 'down the drain,' into a blind >>> > alley from which nobody has yet escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like >>> > that."--Richard Feynman on the apparent absurdities of quantum behavior >>> > >>> > "The chance is high that the truth lies in the fashionable direction. >>> > But, on the off chance that it is in another direction — a direction >>> > obvious from an unfashionable view of field theory — who will find it? >>> > Only someone who has sacrificed himself by teaching himself quantum >>> > electrodynamics from a peculiar and unfashionable point of view; one that >>> > he may have to invent for himself."--Richard Feynman, Nobel lecture, 1965 >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>>
