Rick Archer likes the controversy. At least Ravi has the excuse of being mentally ill. Vaj is just as slanderous but he acts maliciously and in bad faith.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@...> wrote: > > > > I agree with Doug. Ravi's continual slanderous, obscenity-laden posts drag > this forum down into the sewer. He should be expelled from this forum without > delay. It is one thing to have serious, even angry disputes with people, but > the other feuding parties here avoid excesses such as those demonstrated > almost every day by Ravi. If the moderators have any respect for their own > forum, they should take action on this issue. If Ravi wants to indulge in his > absurd, offensive adolescent fantasies he should find another place to do it. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > Yep, I agree with Curtis here. What RaviC is doing here is sinful by > > resolution and no good for the community here. He is not contributing to > > the conversation but fishing it with this kind of spiritual abuse. As much > > as anything he is mocking Rick with this stuff. This is needless over the > > top abuse. The FFL list Moderators should unsubscribe this guy Ravi from > > FFL. The guy has fouled out, so to speak. Unsubscribe him now. > > -Buck > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > Scanning over the posts this morning was a little wake-up call. Imagine > > > my surprise (second time use I know, so lamo but I'm just getting started > > > here and I'm not warmed up creatively) to see this in the headers: > > > > > > "but Steve not being a pervert like Curtis who used his power in a cult > > > to prey on innocent women" > > > > > > I gotta say for the first time in all the years posting here, I > > > considered unlisting. Not because someone said something inflammatory > > > and untrue about me, but this is a special case of Internet tolling. I > > > have become a repetitive negative focus for someone and I really can't > > > win here. The amount of energy such an individual can expend on such a > > > malicious project is endless (within the 50 posts mercifully) So first > > > thanks and props to Steve who gets that this could have an impact on me > > > professionally, due to the amount of material being generated here. It > > > makes me look like someone with a controversial past which is untrue. No > > > matter how many times I post a rebuttal this will just stoke the > > > enthusiasm for more posting. Flooding a forum like this will a lie > > > repetitively is a power tactic for slander rewarded by search engines for > > > anyone checking me out here. Being associated with a term like "pervert" > > > is malicious. > > > > > > There is no way to reconcile my view in support of Internet freedom and > > > particularly the freedom we enjoy here with limiting Ravi's right to make > > > such repetitive posts. It could hurt me although to chances of that seem > > > small at this point. He attempted to get on my Facebook page, which > > > would have escalated the malicious stalking, but I can control that so it > > > seems that if he wants to continue this campaign here, I am relatively > > > safe. And I believe that at this point unsubscribing would not be an > > > answer because of the repetitive nature of his tourettes like assaults, > > > there is no guarantee that they would cease, I would just be cutting > > > myself off from being able to defend myself. So in the manor used for > > > credit report where someone malicious has decided to assume your identity > > > and F up your credit, I will be adding a statement regularly for anyone > > > who is checking up on me here so that my position is clear concerning > > > these charges. It will also serve as a record of my own clear denials > > > and counter-charges of malicious intent. Due to the way these posts get > > > viewed online I will give it its own heading in the following post. > > > > > > This challenge was an interesting one. It really made me think. What is > > > the cost of freedom? Freedom is not free. I will happily pay the price > > > and will not "go gentle into that good night". I'm fighting back for my > > > own rights and searchable reputation. > > > > > >
