Ravi you are once again going too far with your malicious intent here. Outing someone's full real name when they are using a handle is uncool and may have serious repercussions for their lives.
Part of the freedom of expression here is supported by people's choice to decide if they want their POV here linked to the searchable internet. Your expressed intent to humiliate someone here is also out of line. I consider this post to be beyond the pail of interactions here. I have been contacted by people offlist who you have cowered with your aggressive malicious campaign. I speak for them and for myself in telling you that this behavior is not acceptable here. --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > What a pathetic, miserable life my retarded psychologist (Name Deleted By > Curtis), not a single experience, not a single person who acknowledges him, > sucking furiously at TM and Prozac and drawing a blank..LOL..the only thing > he looks forward to is my emails do he can at least get some attention, > perverse satisfaction as I humiliate him, bitch slap him in my enlightened > mania. > > Stephen, you little bitch, you made my day..LOL.. > > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > > And yeah I looked at your picture on FB last year, you came up on my friend > > suggestions. > > > > Not only are you a retarded psychologist Stephen, you looked like a > > lifeless depressed son of a bitch on a cocktail of meds. I suppose they are > > free since you are so eager to suck Prozac Inc's dicks. > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > > >> Shut the fuck up Stephen, you little bitch before I bitch slap you in my > >> enlightened mania. > >> > >> You never responded to the little assignment I gave you sly motherfucker. > >> > >> > >> On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:59 PM, "shukra69" <shukra69@...> wrote: > >> > >>> Rick Archer likes the controversy. At least Ravi has the excuse of being > >>> mentally ill. Vaj is just as slanderous but he acts maliciously and in > >>> bad faith. > >>> > >>> --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > I agree with Doug. Ravi's continual slanderous, obscenity-laden posts > >>> > drag this forum down into the sewer. He should be expelled from this > >>> > forum without delay. It is one thing to have serious, even angry > >>> > disputes with people, but the other feuding parties here avoid excesses > >>> > such as those demonstrated almost every day by Ravi. If the moderators > >>> > have any respect for their own forum, they should take action on this > >>> > issue. If Ravi wants to indulge in his absurd, offensive adolescent > >>> > fantasies he should find another place to do it. > >>> > > >>> > --- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > Yep, I agree with Curtis here. What RaviC is doing here is sinful by > >>> > > resolution and no good for the community here. He is not contributing > >>> > > to the conversation but fishing it with this kind of spiritual abuse. > >>> > > As much as anything he is mocking Rick with this stuff. This is > >>> > > needless over the top abuse. The FFL list Moderators should > >>> > > unsubscribe this guy Ravi from FFL. The guy has fouled out, so to > >>> > > speak. Unsubscribe him now. > >>> > > -Buck > >>> > > > >>> > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > >>> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Scanning over the posts this morning was a little wake-up call. > >>> > > > Imagine my surprise (second time use I know, so lamo but I'm just > >>> > > > getting started here and I'm not warmed up creatively) to see this > >>> > > > in the headers: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > "but Steve not being a pervert like Curtis who used his power in a > >>> > > > cult to prey on innocent women" > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I gotta say for the first time in all the years posting here, I > >>> > > > considered unlisting. Not because someone said something > >>> > > > inflammatory and untrue about me, but this is a special case of > >>> > > > Internet tolling. I have become a repetitive negative focus for > >>> > > > someone and I really can't win here. The amount of energy such an > >>> > > > individual can expend on such a malicious project is endless > >>> > > > (within the 50 posts mercifully) So first thanks and props to Steve > >>> > > > who gets that this could have an impact on me professionally, due > >>> > > > to the amount of material being generated here. It makes me look > >>> > > > like someone with a controversial past which is untrue. No matter > >>> > > > how many times I post a rebuttal this will just stoke the > >>> > > > enthusiasm for more posting. Flooding a forum like this will a lie > >>> > > > repetitively is a power tactic for slander rewarded by search > >>> > > > engines for anyone checking me out here. Being associated with a > >>> > > > term like "pervert" is malicious. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > There is no way to reconcile my view in support of Internet freedom > >>> > > > and particularly the freedom we enjoy here with limiting Ravi's > >>> > > > right to make such repetitive posts. It could hurt me although to > >>> > > > chances of that seem small at this point. He attempted to get on my > >>> > > > Facebook page, which would have escalated the malicious stalking, > >>> > > > but I can control that so it seems that if he wants to continue > >>> > > > this campaign here, I am relatively safe. And I believe that at > >>> > > > this point unsubscribing would not be an answer because of the > >>> > > > repetitive nature of his tourettes like assaults, there is no > >>> > > > guarantee that they would cease, I would just be cutting myself off > >>> > > > from being able to defend myself. So in the manor used for credit > >>> > > > report where someone malicious has decided to assume your identity > >>> > > > and F up your credit, I will be adding a statement regularly for > >>> > > > anyone who is checking up on me here so that my position is clear > >>> > > > concerning these charges. It will also serve as a record of my own > >>> > > > clear denials and counter-charges of malicious intent. Due to the > >>> > > > way these posts get viewed online I will give it its own heading in > >>> > > > the following post. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > This challenge was an interesting one. It really made me think. > >>> > > > What is the cost of freedom? Freedom is not free. I will happily > >>> > > > pay the price and will not "go gentle into that good night". I'm > >>> > > > fighting back for my own rights and searchable reputation. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >
