While I do not object to Ravi's rants, I do feel he is exceeding social 
interaction limits, like a guest shitting on one's dining room table. So I 
support Curtis's position here. I think it prudent for Ravi to tone it down. It 
is not playful, and it is not helpful.

--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> 
wrote:
>
> So lets see if I have this right.  When you send me a Facebook friend 
> request, and look at your page, then turn it down, it is me obsessing on you.
> 
> If you post a link and I look at it, I am being perverse...
> 
> Your language is inappropriately obscene and harsh for a public board like 
> this Ravi.  I object to your abusive language here.
> 
> Ravi Chivukula does not know me personally and has no inside information 
> about me.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> >
> > Curtis,
> > 
> > A few more clues - Don't checkout FB page so you retards pop up on friends 
> > suggestions, stop watching my videos from Virginia and Netherlands. Stop 
> > this perverse masochistic obsession on me.
> > 
> > You are my Rakshasaa, my metaphorical demon of deception. Consider yourself 
> > lucky that I even deemed to spend this much time an old dumb pervert like 
> > you.
> > 
> > STOP your malicious, evil campaign here.
> > 
> > Love,
> > Ravi
> > 
> > 
> > On Jan 9, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > 
> > > Curtis, fuck you and your malicious, retarded, perverted behavior, if 
> > > Stephen had a problem he would tell me so, if you don't want people to 
> > > know your real name please use a fake email id.
> > > 
> > > So get a clue you dumb motherfucker.
> > > 
> > > Love,
> > > Ravi
> > > 
> > > On Jan 9, 2012, at 6:32 AM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Ravi you are once again going too far with your malicious intent here. 
> > >> Outing someone's full real name when they are using a handle is uncool 
> > >> and may have serious repercussions for their lives. 
> > >> 
> > >> Part of the freedom of expression here is supported by people's choice 
> > >> to decide if they want their POV here linked to the searchable internet.
> > >> 
> > >> Your expressed intent to humiliate someone here is also out of line.
> > >> 
> > >> I consider this post to be beyond the pail of interactions here. I have 
> > >> been contacted by people offlist who you have cowered with your 
> > >> aggressive malicious campaign. 
> > >> 
> > >> I speak for them and for myself in telling you that this behavior is not 
> > >> acceptable here. 
> > >> 
> > >> --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> 
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > What a pathetic, miserable life my retarded psychologist (Name Deleted 
> > >> > By Curtis), not a single experience, not a single person who 
> > >> > acknowledges him, sucking furiously at TM and Prozac and drawing a 
> > >> > blank..LOL..the only thing he looks forward to is my emails do he can 
> > >> > at least get some attention, perverse satisfaction as I humiliate him, 
> > >> > bitch slap him in my enlightened mania.
> > >> > 
> > >> > Stephen, you little bitch, you made my day..LOL..
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > >> > 
> > >> > > And yeah I looked at your picture on FB last year, you came up on my 
> > >> > > friend suggestions.
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > Not only are you a retarded psychologist Stephen, you looked like a 
> > >> > > lifeless depressed son of a bitch on a cocktail of meds. I suppose 
> > >> > > they are free since you are so eager to suck Prozac Inc's dicks.
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > >> > > 
> > >> > >> Shut the fuck up Stephen, you little bitch before I bitch slap you 
> > >> > >> in my enlightened mania.
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> You never responded to the little assignment I gave you sly 
> > >> > >> motherfucker.
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:59 PM, "shukra69" <shukra69@> wrote:
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >>> Rick Archer likes the controversy. At least Ravi has the excuse of 
> > >> > >>> being mentally ill. Vaj is just as slanderous but he acts 
> > >> > >>> maliciously and in bad faith.
> > >> > >>> 
> > >> > >>> --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> wrote:
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > 
> > >> > >>> > 
> > >> > >>> > I agree with Doug. Ravi's continual slanderous, obscenity-laden 
> > >> > >>> > posts drag this forum down into the sewer. He should be expelled 
> > >> > >>> > from this forum without delay. It is one thing to have serious, 
> > >> > >>> > even angry disputes with people, but the other feuding parties 
> > >> > >>> > here avoid excesses such as those demonstrated almost every day 
> > >> > >>> > by Ravi. If the moderators have any respect for their own forum, 
> > >> > >>> > they should take action on this issue. If Ravi wants to indulge 
> > >> > >>> > in his absurd, offensive adolescent fantasies he should find 
> > >> > >>> > another place to do it. 
> > >> > >>> > 
> > >> > >>> > --- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> 
> > >> > >>> > wrote:
> > >> > >>> > >
> > >> > >>> > > Yep, I agree with Curtis here. What RaviC is doing here is 
> > >> > >>> > > sinful by resolution and no good for the community here. He is 
> > >> > >>> > > not contributing to the conversation but fishing it with this 
> > >> > >>> > > kind of spiritual abuse. As much as anything he is mocking 
> > >> > >>> > > Rick with this stuff. This is needless over the top abuse. The 
> > >> > >>> > > FFL list Moderators should unsubscribe this guy Ravi from FFL. 
> > >> > >>> > >  The guy has fouled out, so to speak. Unsubscribe him now.
> > >> > >>> > > -Buck 
> > >> > >>> > > 
> > >> > >>> > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
> > >> > >>> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >> > >>> > > >
> > >> > >>> > > > Scanning over the posts this morning was a little wake-up 
> > >> > >>> > > > call. Imagine my surprise (second time use I know, so lamo 
> > >> > >>> > > > but I'm just getting started here and I'm not warmed up 
> > >> > >>> > > > creatively) to see this in the headers:
> > >> > >>> > > > 
> > >> > >>> > > > "but Steve not being a pervert like Curtis who used his 
> > >> > >>> > > > power in a cult to prey on innocent women"
> > >> > >>> > > > 
> > >> > >>> > > > I gotta say for the first time in all the years posting 
> > >> > >>> > > > here, I considered unlisting. Not because someone said 
> > >> > >>> > > > something inflammatory and untrue about me, but this is a 
> > >> > >>> > > > special case of Internet tolling. I have become a repetitive 
> > >> > >>> > > > negative focus for someone and I really can't win here. The 
> > >> > >>> > > > amount of energy such an individual can expend on such a 
> > >> > >>> > > > malicious project is endless (within the 50 posts 
> > >> > >>> > > > mercifully) So first thanks and props to Steve who gets that 
> > >> > >>> > > > this could have an impact on me professionally, due to the 
> > >> > >>> > > > amount of material being generated here. It makes me look 
> > >> > >>> > > > like someone with a controversial past which is untrue. No 
> > >> > >>> > > > matter how many times I post a rebuttal this will just stoke 
> > >> > >>> > > > the enthusiasm for more posting. Flooding a forum like this 
> > >> > >>> > > > will a lie repetitively is a power tactic for slander 
> > >> > >>> > > > rewarded by search engines for anyone checking me out here. 
> > >> > >>> > > > Being associated with a term like "pervert" is malicious. 
> > >> > >>> > > > 
> > >> > >>> > > > There is no way to reconcile my view in support of Internet 
> > >> > >>> > > > freedom and particularly the freedom we enjoy here with 
> > >> > >>> > > > limiting Ravi's right to make such repetitive posts. It 
> > >> > >>> > > > could hurt me although to chances of that seem small at this 
> > >> > >>> > > > point. He attempted to get on my Facebook page, which would 
> > >> > >>> > > > have escalated the malicious stalking, but I can control 
> > >> > >>> > > > that so it seems that if he wants to continue this campaign 
> > >> > >>> > > > here, I am relatively safe. And I believe that at this point 
> > >> > >>> > > > unsubscribing would not be an answer because of the 
> > >> > >>> > > > repetitive nature of his tourettes like assaults, there is 
> > >> > >>> > > > no guarantee that they would cease, I would just be cutting 
> > >> > >>> > > > myself off from being able to defend myself. So in the manor 
> > >> > >>> > > > used for credit report where someone malicious has decided 
> > >> > >>> > > > to assume your identity and F up your credit, I will be 
> > >> > >>> > > > adding a statement regularly for anyone who is checking up 
> > >> > >>> > > > on me here so that my position is clear concerning these 
> > >> > >>> > > > charges. It will also serve as a record of my own clear 
> > >> > >>> > > > denials and counter-charges of malicious intent. Due to the 
> > >> > >>> > > > way these posts get viewed online I will give it its own 
> > >> > >>> > > > heading in the following post.
> > >> > >>> > > > 
> > >> > >>> > > > This challenge was an interesting one. It really made me 
> > >> > >>> > > > think. What is the cost of freedom? Freedom is not free. I 
> > >> > >>> > > > will happily pay the price and will not "go gentle into that 
> > >> > >>> > > > good night". I'm fighting back for my own rights and 
> > >> > >>> > > > searchable reputation.
> > >> > >>> > > >
> > >> > >>> > >
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> 
> > >> > >>>
> > >> >
> > >> 
> > >>
> >
>


Reply via email to