My 2c: "Crazy Wisdom" is an oxymoron. Craziness is what is is, nothing "deep" about it (Cf. the life of Adi Da, the consummate embodiment of self-styled Crazy Wisdom). .. People simply have preferences, crazy or otherwise. I use a game-theory approach to analyzing such behavior - in terms of a goal, there are costs/benefits. For example: Somebody says, "I would like to have a robust sexual life with 16,000 Gopis". Fine, this is a legitimate preference but by no means indicative of Enlightenment, since many Traditionally recognized Enlightened people had no sex life at all that we know of. ... Next step in game theory is to accept the statement on the surface, then go on from there in term of fulfilling the goal. If the reply is...."...the Gopis haven't shown up yet and besides, I'm married"; then I'd say the original statement is socially maladaptive, and thus "crazy". http://fantazos.us/pages/The%20House%20Key.htm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@> > wrote: > > > > While I do not object to Ravi's rants, I do feel he is exceeding > > social interaction limits, like a guest shitting on one's dining > > room table. So I support Curtis's position here. I think it > > prudent for Ravi to tone it down. It is not playful, and it is > > not helpful. > > I, for one, would love to see who agrees with this > statement, and who does not. > > Step up to the line and declare your allegiance with > Ravi, or do the opposite. > > Then live with it. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > So lets see if I have this right. When you send me a Facebook friend > > > request, and look at your page, then turn it down, it is me obsessing on > > > you. > > > > > > If you post a link and I look at it, I am being perverse... > > > > > > Your language is inappropriately obscene and harsh for a public board > > > like this Ravi. I object to your abusive language here. > > > > > > Ravi Chivukula does not know me personally and has no inside information > > > about me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Curtis, > > > > > > > > A few more clues - Don't checkout FB page so you retards pop up on > > > > friends suggestions, stop watching my videos from Virginia and > > > > Netherlands. Stop this perverse masochistic obsession on me. > > > > > > > > You are my Rakshasaa, my metaphorical demon of deception. Consider > > > > yourself lucky that I even deemed to spend this much time an old dumb > > > > pervert like you. > > > > > > > > STOP your malicious, evil campaign here. > > > > > > > > Love, > > > > Ravi > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Curtis, fuck you and your malicious, retarded, perverted behavior, if > > > > > Stephen had a problem he would tell me so, if you don't want people > > > > > to know your real name please use a fake email id. > > > > > > > > > > So get a clue you dumb motherfucker. > > > > > > > > > > Love, > > > > > Ravi > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2012, at 6:32 AM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Ravi you are once again going too far with your malicious intent > > > > >> here. Outing someone's full real name when they are using a handle > > > > >> is uncool and may have serious repercussions for their lives. > > > > >> > > > > >> Part of the freedom of expression here is supported by people's > > > > >> choice to decide if they want their POV here linked to the > > > > >> searchable internet. > > > > >> > > > > >> Your expressed intent to humiliate someone here is also out of line. > > > > >> > > > > >> I consider this post to be beyond the pail of interactions here. I > > > > >> have been contacted by people offlist who you have cowered with your > > > > >> aggressive malicious campaign. > > > > >> > > > > >> I speak for them and for myself in telling you that this behavior is > > > > >> not acceptable here. > > > > >> > > > > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula > > > > >> <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > What a pathetic, miserable life my retarded psychologist (Name > > > > >> > Deleted By Curtis), not a single experience, not a single person > > > > >> > who acknowledges him, sucking furiously at TM and Prozac and > > > > >> > drawing a blank..LOL..the only thing he looks forward to is my > > > > >> > emails do he can at least get some attention, perverse > > > > >> > satisfaction as I humiliate him, bitch slap him in my enlightened > > > > >> > mania. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Stephen, you little bitch, you made my day..LOL.. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > And yeah I looked at your picture on FB last year, you came up > > > > >> > > on my friend suggestions. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Not only are you a retarded psychologist Stephen, you looked > > > > >> > > like a lifeless depressed son of a bitch on a cocktail of meds. > > > > >> > > I suppose they are free since you are so eager to suck Prozac > > > > >> > > Inc's dicks. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Shut the fuck up Stephen, you little bitch before I bitch slap > > > > >> > >> you in my enlightened mania. > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> You never responded to the little assignment I gave you sly > > > > >> > >> motherfucker. > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:59 PM, "shukra69" <shukra69@> wrote: > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >>> Rick Archer likes the controversy. At least Ravi has the > > > > >> > >>> excuse of being mentally ill. Vaj is just as slanderous but he > > > > >> > >>> acts maliciously and in bad faith. > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> > > > > >> > >>> wrote: > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > I agree with Doug. Ravi's continual slanderous, > > > > >> > >>> > obscenity-laden posts drag this forum down into the sewer. > > > > >> > >>> > He should be expelled from this forum without delay. It is > > > > >> > >>> > one thing to have serious, even angry disputes with people, > > > > >> > >>> > but the other feuding parties here avoid excesses such as > > > > >> > >>> > those demonstrated almost every day by Ravi. If the > > > > >> > >>> > moderators have any respect for their own forum, they should > > > > >> > >>> > take action on this issue. If Ravi wants to indulge in his > > > > >> > >>> > absurd, offensive adolescent fantasies he should find > > > > >> > >>> > another place to do it. > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" > > > > >> > >>> > <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > Yep, I agree with Curtis here. What RaviC is doing here is > > > > >> > >>> > > sinful by resolution and no good for the community here. > > > > >> > >>> > > He is not contributing to the conversation but fishing it > > > > >> > >>> > > with this kind of spiritual abuse. As much as anything he > > > > >> > >>> > > is mocking Rick with this stuff. This is needless over the > > > > >> > >>> > > top abuse. The FFL list Moderators should unsubscribe this > > > > >> > >>> > > guy Ravi from FFL. The guy has fouled out, so to speak. > > > > >> > >>> > > Unsubscribe him now. > > > > >> > >>> > > -Buck > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > >> > >>> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > Scanning over the posts this morning was a little > > > > >> > >>> > > > wake-up call. Imagine my surprise (second time use I > > > > >> > >>> > > > know, so lamo but I'm just getting started here and I'm > > > > >> > >>> > > > not warmed up creatively) to see this in the headers: > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > "but Steve not being a pervert like Curtis who used his > > > > >> > >>> > > > power in a cult to prey on innocent women" > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > I gotta say for the first time in all the years posting > > > > >> > >>> > > > here, I considered unlisting. Not because someone said > > > > >> > >>> > > > something inflammatory and untrue about me, but this is > > > > >> > >>> > > > a special case of Internet tolling. I have become a > > > > >> > >>> > > > repetitive negative focus for someone and I really can't > > > > >> > >>> > > > win here. The amount of energy such an individual can > > > > >> > >>> > > > expend on such a malicious project is endless (within > > > > >> > >>> > > > the 50 posts mercifully) So first thanks and props to > > > > >> > >>> > > > Steve who gets that this could have an impact on me > > > > >> > >>> > > > professionally, due to the amount of material being > > > > >> > >>> > > > generated here. It makes me look like someone with a > > > > >> > >>> > > > controversial past which is untrue. No matter how many > > > > >> > >>> > > > times I post a rebuttal this will just stoke the > > > > >> > >>> > > > enthusiasm for more posting. Flooding a forum like this > > > > >> > >>> > > > will a lie repetitively is a power tactic for slander > > > > >> > >>> > > > rewarded by search engines for anyone checking me out > > > > >> > >>> > > > here. Being associated with a term like "pervert" is > > > > >> > >>> > > > malicious. > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > There is no way to reconcile my view in support of > > > > >> > >>> > > > Internet freedom and particularly the freedom we enjoy > > > > >> > >>> > > > here with limiting Ravi's right to make such repetitive > > > > >> > >>> > > > posts. It could hurt me although to chances of that seem > > > > >> > >>> > > > small at this point. He attempted to get on my Facebook > > > > >> > >>> > > > page, which would have escalated the malicious stalking, > > > > >> > >>> > > > but I can control that so it seems that if he wants to > > > > >> > >>> > > > continue this campaign here, I am relatively safe. And I > > > > >> > >>> > > > believe that at this point unsubscribing would not be an > > > > >> > >>> > > > answer because of the repetitive nature of his tourettes > > > > >> > >>> > > > like assaults, there is no guarantee that they would > > > > >> > >>> > > > cease, I would just be cutting myself off from being > > > > >> > >>> > > > able to defend myself. So in the manor used for credit > > > > >> > >>> > > > report where someone malicious has decided to assume > > > > >> > >>> > > > your identity and F up your credit, I will be adding a > > > > >> > >>> > > > statement regularly for anyone who is checking up on me > > > > >> > >>> > > > here so that my position is clear concerning these > > > > >> > >>> > > > charges. It will also serve as a record of my own clear > > > > >> > >>> > > > denials and counter-charges of malicious intent. Due to > > > > >> > >>> > > > the way these posts get viewed online I will give it its > > > > >> > >>> > > > own heading in the following post. > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > This challenge was an interesting one. It really made me > > > > >> > >>> > > > think. What is the cost of freedom? Freedom is not free. > > > > >> > >>> > > > I will happily pay the price and will not "go gentle > > > > >> > >>> > > > into that good night". I'm fighting back for my own > > > > >> > >>> > > > rights and searchable reputation. > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
