--- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > Just out of curiosity Judy, what is wrong with changing ones > position on an issue?
Nothing in principle, it just appears to be your modus operandi. And there doesn't seem to be any more reason for your having taken one viewpoint than there does for your switching to another. It looks as though whatever's under your nose at the moment is what you go with. I can't sense any underlying orientation or philosophy or approach to making choices that determines or influences either your initial positions or the ones you change to. I think you have keyed in on something I do, which is to > sometimes vaccilate as different viewpoints are made. I > do find myself persuaded by something Curtis might say, or > you might say, or someone else. Or for that matter > something Obama might say, or something my wife might say. > But why would this be viewed as a flaw? > > This is not so much a challenge, but just seeking a little > clarification. > > Thanks. > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks, Curtis for bringing this into relief. > > > > And Steve, predictably, goes with whatever context he's > > read most recently, especially if he senses a trend in > > the direction of that context.
