Now let's see, Steve, whether you do the right thing and enlighten Vaj as to what Raunchy actually said, since Vaj has misunderstood your capsule description.
--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > On Jan 22, 2012, at 6:56 PM, seventhray1 wrote: > > > But today, you have Raunchy coming in with a blistering > > attack on Vaj's credibility. > > Gee, I guess I should be glad I don't read all the posts > here: there's always the latest bunch of character assassins > you're expected to respond to. Just because I don't waste > my time on this crap doesn't mean it's OK or anything I agree > with. > > Screw her, she wasn't there, I was. Hint: Not a thing about being there or not. Here, I'll make it easy for you. This is what Raunchy wrote: "Vaj, your obsessive interest in Robin's long ago seminars boarders on pathological. Given your animus to Robin, why on earth would anyone trust you with Robin's old video tapes? Private circulation, my ass. Is a video always kept private once it's possible to upload it to youtube? I don't believe for a minute that you care about 'horribly damaging' anyone. Creepy. Creepy. Creepy, SOB." I'm betting you won't.
