--- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > When is anyone going to learn, Judy has the upper hand when > > it comes to the English language and its use. : ) > > (points out the obvious.) > > When is everyone going to learn that believing > that interaction on this forum is *about* "having > the upper hand" is intensely low-vibe and indicative > of a someone retarded level of evolution? >
I think when believing analogies and evolution are used in the same sentence as fact? LOL. > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I appreciate that Steve. I think you articulated well that > > > > we all have very different relationships with people here. > > > > Comparing how we relate to different people differently as > > > > if this shows character flaws is IMO a contrived bogus > > > > judgement. > > > > > > But not, of course, one that was being made in this case. > > > > > > > And not being interested in "calling people out" is a > > > > legitimate way to enjoy the place. > > > > > > But not, of course, one that was being criticized in this > > > case. > > > > > > > In some ways you have been played between people for speaking > > > > up with your opinion. > > > > > > But not, of course, in this case. > > > > > > > Sometimes that has been in agreement with me and sometimes > > > > you haven't agreed with me. But I have always found that > > > > if I respond to you with my POV, you at least consider it, > > > > and I appreciate that about your participation here. > > > > > > > > I don't buy Judy's critique which makes you appear to not > > > > have your own mind about issues and swayed by the breeze. > > > > I believe you are just not as judgmental a person as some > > > > here (myself included) and that openness is reflected in > > > > your responses in the moment. > > > > > > Wow. Talk about imposing your own context! > > > > > > > It seems like a good quality > > > > to me and not something you deserve to be shamed for. > > > > > > As you've seen fit to define it. > > > > > >
