--- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > That's what Panetta said. But this revelation smells like > > a subterfuge to confuse the Iranians. If this was a true > > story, why would Panetta leak the story and then deny it > > when asked by reporters? > > > > http://news.yahoo.com/panetta-says-israel-could-strike-iran-spring-report-232458035.html > > > > JR > > I am surprised Israel has not attacked already, judging > from past history. They have the most at stake immediately. > It would also solve problems for other countries unwilling > to just go in and bomb Iran, which is probably what they > would like to do. Will Rogers said some 80 years ago that > diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice doggie' until you can > find a rock. Israel is probably the rock. Then all the other > nations can claim they felt diplomacy would have worked.
It's too bad Maharishi never thought of sending teams of dedicated Governors of the Age of Enlight- enment to Iran to buttbounce for peace. If he had, surely their all-powerful Woo Woo would have chilled the place out such that things like building a bomb wouldn't have even occurred to them.
