--- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > That's what Panetta said. But this revelation smells like > > > a subterfuge to confuse the Iranians. If this was a true > > > story, why would Panetta leak the story and then deny it > > > when asked by reporters? > > > > > > http://news.yahoo.com/panetta-says-israel-could-strike-iran-spring-report-232458035.html > > > > > > JR > > > > I am surprised Israel has not attacked already, judging > > from past history. They have the most at stake immediately. > > It would also solve problems for other countries unwilling > > to just go in and bomb Iran, which is probably what they > > would like to do. Will Rogers said some 80 years ago that > > diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice doggie' until you can > > find a rock. Israel is probably the rock. Then all the other > > nations can claim they felt diplomacy would have worked. > > It's too bad Maharishi never thought of sending > teams of dedicated Governors of the Age of Enlight- > enment to Iran to buttbounce for peace. If he had, > surely their all-powerful Woo Woo would have chilled > the place out such that things like building a bomb > wouldn't have even occurred to them.
Actually he did, in 1978, as the Iranian government of the Shah collapsed, but the governors had to leave as the situation deteriorated. He sent them to other countries then too, which I do not remember, except one in Central America somewhere. Then success was proclaimed. I think this was called the World Peach Project.
