--- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > That's what Panetta said. But this revelation smells like a subterfuge to > > confuse the Iranians. If this was a true story, why would Panetta leak the > > story and then deny it when asked by reporters? > > > > http://news.yahoo.com/panetta-says-israel-could-strike-iran-spring-report-232458035.html > > > > JR > > I am surprised Israel has not attacked already, judging from past history. > They have the most at stake immediately. It would also solve problems for > other countries unwilling to just go in and bomb Iran, which is probably what > they would like to do. Will Rogers said some 80 years ago that diplomacy is > the art of saying 'nice doggie' until you can find a rock. Israel is probably > the rock. Then all the other nations can claim they felt diplomacy would have > worked.
During a recent interview, Ahmenidijad and his Republican Guards will be waiting for the Israeli planes to come over. He said they will be sorry for taking on Iran. This is typical saber-rattling rhetoric. But when push comes to shove, the Israelis will attack in the most undexpected ways.
