Barry, you couldn't resist this dead horse and you are actually asking for clarification?!?!?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Can't resist. :-) > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > Awww, I don't know if it's permanent...for you > > > maybe...."reputation"? Really? I think he [Curtis] > > > just got angry. > > > > Sure, he got angry. But being angry doesn't give one > > license to be unethical. And this was one of the most > > unethical things I've ever seen anyone do on FFL. > > Just in the interest of science, please rank what > Curtis did on your personal scale of "most unethical" > among these other contenders. Please explain for us > which of them ranks as "more unethical" than the > others, and why. We'll wait. > > * Curtis suggesting that Judy might not be happy if > she knew what Robin really thought of her. > > * Judy not just suggesting but stating many times that > someone on FFL had made a "death threat" against her, > knowing that to be a false claim. > > * Raunchy dissing Sal and then, when the facts were > pointed out to her, doubling down rather than simply > apologizing. > > * Ravi attempting to smear someone's reputation and > ability to make a living by making up stories about > him being a pervert and flooding Internet search > engines with them. > > * Tom posting pornography to Fairfield Life and then > notifying the Yahoo administrators, in an attempt to > get the site taken down, because someone on it > dissed him by calling him a racist, shortly after > several posts in which he *bragged* about being a > racist. > > * Jim posting under at least four different aliases > on FFL, claiming vociferously that it wasn't him but > then stupidly posting material copyrighted to himself > under one or more of the aliases. All of this while > claiming to be enlightened. > > Am I correct in feeling, Judy, that you consider what > Curtis did "more unethical" than any of these? Please > explain why you believe that. > > *THAT* should get her to post out by Tuesday. :-) >
