--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote: > > > So, for me personally I am choosing to give everyone the > > benefit of the doubt. I am going to assume Curtis was feeling > > like he wanted to lash out in Judy in some way in his > > frustration with her..." > > Me: > Wow I'd hate to see what you would write if you weren't giving > me the "benefit of the doubt!"
See my upcoming post. Not what Ann would write, of course, but I don't think there is any doubt of which Curtis deserves the benefit. > Ann: > <...so if Curtis was trying in some way to undermine the > apparent healthy relationship between Judy and Robin it > didn't work.> > > Me: > More benefit? > Unlike Judy picking out the most obnoxious quotes from Robin > and my posts in the past, which was an obvious attempt to > patch things up between us no doubt. These quotes are from public posts by Robin, not private communications that I characterized to serve my purposes and then refused to quote so the accuracy of my characterization could be verified. Moreover, I dated the quotes so the chronology was clear, and anyone can check the context by looking up the posts with Yahoo Advanced Search. (I'll be happy to provide direct links if anyone is interested.) Plus which, the quotes from Robin's posts are highly relevant to the case I've made against Curtis in these disputes. The same cannot be said for what Curtis has said about his private communications with Robin--except, of course, insofar as the nature of Curtis's behavior supports that very same case. That Curtis believes, or would pretend, that what I did is ethically equivalent to what he did is still more evidence of his fundamental lack of integrity. > Ann > <I can conjecture from Judy's recent posts on this subject > that she is perfectly comfortable with whatever went down > between Robin and Curtis regarding her.> > > Me: Yeah, she seems to have not given it a second thought. What I have given "second thoughts" to is Curtis's "dark side," his character flaws, not Robin's private communications with Curtis concerning me, with which, as Ann says, I am perfectly comfortable, whatever they involve. Note that Curtis has just indicated that making me uncomfortable was indeed the goal of his unethical behavior. Now let's see if Curtis doubles down on that unethical behavior by insisting that there's no way I would be comfortable with those communications if I could see them, but goldurn it, he just has too much integrity to quote them, so everyone will have to take his word for it. Hypocrite. As Ann says, I am "confident enough in [my] relationship with Robin to understand that he would have his own, valid reasons for writing whatever he wrote to Curtis." Full stop on that point.
